O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-21-130 (2019)

Legislative intent

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

It is the intent of this article to provide funding for local victim assistance programs.

History

(Code 1981, § 15-21-130, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 260, § 3.)

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 4 cases (3 in the last 5 years), 2000–2021 · leading case: Young v. State, 860 S.E.2d 746 (Ga. 2021).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Young v. State, 860 S.E.2d 746 (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “Young argues that the State’s use of funds from a victim assistance account, see OCGA § 15-21-130 et seq., to reimburse four witnesses for their lost wages without disclosing this fact to him at trial constituted unconstitutional evidence suppression because evidence of the use…”

Villedrouin v. State, 542 S.E.2d 160 (Ga. Ct. App. 2000). · cites it 2× “Villedrouin was sentenced to four years confinement to be served on probation, a fine of $1,000, plus $50 pursuant to OCGA § 15-21-73, plus $100 pursuant to OCGA § 15-21-90, plus $50 for the Crime Victims’ Assistance Program pursuant to OCGA § 15-21-130, plus restitution in the…”

Young v. State (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “Young argues that the State’s use of funds from a victim assistance account, see OCGA § 15-21-130 et seq., to reimburse four witnesses for their lost wages without disclosing this fact to him at 10 trial constituted unconstitutional evidence suppression because evidence of the…”

YOUNG v. THE STATE 6-24-2021 Substitute Opinion Issued. (Ga. 2021). · cites it 2× “Young argues that the State’s use of funds from a victim assistance account, see OCGA § 15-21-130 et seq., to reimburse four witnesses for their lost wages without disclosing this fact to him at 10 trial constituted unconstitutional evidence suppression because evidence of the…”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.