O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 15-6-10 (2019)

Discharge of duties

✓ O.C.G.A.: 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Each of the judges of the superior courts shall discharge all the duties required of him by the Constitution and laws for the circuit for which he was elected or appointed and may also hold court and exercise other judicial functions for other circuits when permitted by law.

History

Orig. Code 1863, § 239; Code 1868, § 233; Code 1873, § 243; Code 1882, § 243; Civil Code 1895, § 4317;

Civil Code 1910, § 4846; Code 1933, § 24-2614.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Court having jurisdiction may invalidate fraudulent judgment. - An exception to the general rule that the several superior courts of this state have no extraterritorial jurisdiction enabling the court of one county to set aside a judgment rendered by that of a different county is the rule which provides that a

court having jurisdiction of the person of one who has obtained a judgment by fraud may invalidate and set aside such judgment. Boroughs v. Belcher, 211 Ga. 273, 85 S.E.2d 422 (1955). Cited in Luangkhot v. State, 292 Ga. 423, 736 S.E.2d 397 (2013).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 46 Am. Jur. 2d, Judges, § 21 et seq. C.J.S. - 48A C.J.S., Judges, § 78 et seq.

ALR. - Absence of judge from courtroom during trial of civil case, 25 A.L.R.3d 637.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Luangkhot v. State, 736 S.E.2d 397 (Ga. 2013).
Luangkhot v. State, 736 S.E.2d 397 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 15-6-10 (superior court judge “shall discharge all the duties required of him.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.