Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Orig. Code 1863, § 316; Code 1868, § 377; Code 1873, § 344; Ga. L. 1882-83, p. 70, § 1; Code 1882, § 344; Civil Code 1895, § 4250; Civil Code 1910, § 4808; Code 1933, § 24-1804; Ga. L. 1958, p. 354, § 1; Ga. L. 1974, p. 383, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1617, §§ 1, 2; Ga. L. 1983, p. 3, § 12; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1753, § 1; Ga. L. 1992, p. 6, § 15; Ga. L. 2018, p. 356, § 1-21/SB 436.)
The 2018 amendment, effective July 1, 2018, added subsection (c).
- For article, "Pitfalls in Probate Practice and Procedure," see 21 Ga. B. J. 169 (1958).
- This section specifically provided that issuing all citations required by law is a ministerial duty which the clerk was authorized to perform, and that when there was no clerk and the ordinary (now probate judge) performs this duty, the ordinary (now probate judge) acts in the capacity of clerk. Head v. Waldrup, 193 Ga. 165, 17 S.E.2d 585 (1941).
- Paragraph (a)(11) of this section was complied with since the ordinary (now probate judge) stated in the certificate that the person was the ordinary (now probate judge) and ex officio clerk, and signed in that manner. Sellers v. Page, 127 Ga. 633, 56 S.E. 1011 (1907); Weeks v. Hosch Lumber Co., 133 Ga. 472, 66 S.E. 168, 134 Am. St. R. 213 (1909).
Ordinary's (now probate judge's) certificate sufficiently authenticates the record when it appears affirmatively in the certificate that the ordinary (now probate judge) had no clerk, and was acting personally as the clerk of the ordinary's (now probate judge's) own court. Powell v. Hansard, 206 Ga. 505, 57 S.E.2d 677 (1950).
- Certificate by an ordinary (now probate judge) does not render the copy admissible in evidence, unless it is made affirmatively to appear that there is no clerk other than the ordinary (now probate judge). A certificate by the ordinary (now probate judge) that the ordinary (now probate judge) has no clerk would be in substantial compliance with the requirements of the rule. Powell v. Hansard, 206 Ga. 505, 57 S.E.2d 677 (1950).
- Certificate signed by an ordinary (now probate judge) for the purpose of authenticating a transcript from a record of file in court does not conform to law unless the certificate affirmatively discloses whether or not such ordinary (now probate judge) was also the clerk of that court. Lay v. Sheppard, 112 Ga. 111, 37 S.E. 132 (1900).
Certificate by the ordinary (now probate judge) does not conform to law, unless it affirmatively discloses whether or not such ordinary was also the clerk of that court, but a certificate by the ordinary (now probate judge) in which the ordinary (now probate judge) states that by virtue of the ordinary's (now probate judge's) office the ordinary (now probate judge) is clerk of the ordinary's (now probate judge's) own court would comply with the requirements of this section. Powell v. Hansard, 206 Ga. 505, 57 S.E.2d 677 (1950).
- Order was entered when independent evidence of record in the form of testimony of the clerk of the probate court that the clerk entered the order by entering the notation "granted" in the docket book and an extract of a "granted" entry appearing in the probate court docket. Jabaley v. Jabaley, 208 Ga. App. 179, 430 S.E.2d 119 (1993).
- If a copy of a will is not certified by the clerk of the court of ordinary (now probate court) nor does such certified copy show probate of the will, such copy cannot be legal evidence of title. This is true even though this evidence was introduced without objection since the evidence does not have any probative value, and, as such, is no good for the purpose offered. Goolsby v. Nails, 217 Ga. 348, 122 S.E.2d 248 (1961).
- In order to use a will as a muniment of title, a copy certified by the clerk of the court of ordinary (now probate court) must be introduced showing the probate of the will. However, a copy of a will duly certified that it came from the court of ordinary's (now probate court's) office raises the presumption that such will has been probated. But such copy must be certified by the clerk of the court of ordinary (now probate court), who has jurisdiction over such records. Goolsby v. Nails, 217 Ga. 348, 122 S.E.2d 248 (1961).
- When petition for mandamus to compel ordinary (now probate judge) as clerk of own court to certify certain papers, nowhere alleges that the ordinary (now probate judge) did not certify that the ordinary (now probate judge) had no clerk, or that the ordinary (now probate judge) was acting personally as the clerk of the ordinary's (now probate judge's) own court, or that the ordinary (now probate judge) was also the clerk of that court, the petition failed to state a cause of action for mandamus. Powell v. Hansard, 206 Ga. 505, 57 S.E.2d 677 (1950).
- Action of ordinary (now probate judge) in appointing temporary administrator is merely clerical. Irvine v. Wiley, 145 Ga. 867, 90 S.E. 69 (1916); Collins v. Henry, 155 Ga. 886, 118 S.E. 729 (1923).
- Clerks of probate courts must enter documents and proceedings in set of books established by O.C.G.A. §§ 15-9-37(8) and53-5-21 and must also enter the documents and proceedings in minutes of court, O.C.G.A. § 15-9-37(7), if such matters are applications to court, orders of court, or otherwise show what was done in probate court. 1981 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U81-41.
No results found for Georgia Code 15-9-37.