Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 26-2909.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 1333, § 1.)
- Trial court did not err in denying the defendant's motion to suppress evidence officers found during the booking process at the detention center because its finding there was probable cause for the defendant's arrest for firing a handgun at a street light at a hotel and was not clearly erroneous when the combined facts and circumstances known to the arresting officers were sufficient to warrant a prudent person in believing that the defendant had committed the offense of discharging a firearm on the property of another without permission in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-11-104(a); the defendant matched the unique description of one of the shooters provided by the eyewitness and communicated to the responding officers, and the defendant was encountered by the officers near the scene of the shooting incident shortly after the incident occurred. Davis v. State, 304 Ga. App. 355, 696 S.E.2d 381 (2010).
There is no restriction against carrying an unloaded shotgun in a vehicle through this state. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-30.
- 94 C.J.S., Weapons, § 62 et seq.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2023-12-19
Snippet: a firearm on the property of another, OCGA § 16-11-104, where the same conduct amounted to the felony
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-12-20
Snippet: 12 another, OCGA § 16-11-104. 8 The trial court denied the request, noting