Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 16-11-133 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 16 CRIMES AND OFFENSES

Section 11. Offenses Against Public Order and Safety, 16-11-1 through 16-11-224.

ARTICLE 4 DANGEROUS INSTRUMENTALITIES AND PRACTICES

16-11-133. Minimum periods of confinement for persons convicted who have prior convictions.

  1. As used in this Code section, the term:
    1. "Felony" means any offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or more and includes conviction by a court-martial under the Uniform Code of Military Justice for an offense which would constitute a felony under the laws of the United States.
    2. "Firearm" includes any handgun, rifle, shotgun, stun gun, taser, or other weapon which will or can be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive or electrical charge.
  2. Any person who has previously been convicted of or who has previously entered a guilty plea to the offense of murder, murder in the second degree, armed robbery, home invasion in any degree, kidnapping, rape, aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual battery, or any felony involving the use or possession of a firearm and who shall have on or within arm's reach of his or her person a firearm during the commission of, or the attempt to commit:
    1. Any crime against or involving the person of another;
    2. The unlawful entry into a building or vehicle;
    3. A theft from a building or theft of a vehicle;
    4. Any crime involving the possession, manufacture, delivery, distribution, dispensing, administering, selling, or possession with intent to distribute any controlled substance as provided in Code Section 16-13-30; or
    5. Any crime involving the trafficking of cocaine, marijuana, or illegal drugs as provided in Code Section 16-13-31,

      and which crime is a felony, commits a felony and, upon conviction thereof, shall be punished by confinement for a period of 15 years, such sentence to run consecutively to any other sentence which the person has received.

  3. Upon the second or subsequent conviction of a convicted felon under this Code section, such convicted felon shall be punished by confinement for life. Notwithstanding any other law to the contrary, the sentence of any convicted felon which is imposed for violating this Code section a second or subsequent time shall not be suspended by the court and probationary sentence imposed in lieu thereof.
  4. Any crime committed in violation of subsections (b) and (c) of this Code section shall be considered a separate offense.

(Code 1981, §16-11-133, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 137, § 1; Ga. L. 2014, p. 426, § 5/HB 770; Ga. L. 2014, p. 444, § 2-6/HB 271.)

Law reviews.

- For notes on the 1995 enactment of this Code section and § 16-11-134, see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 112 and 118 (1995).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Sufficient evidence of defendant's prior felony conviction.

- In a prosecution for the use of a firearm by a convicted felon, evidence that a South Carolina court gave the defendant a two-year sentence, with credit for time served, one year of probation to follow, and the balance suspended was sufficient to prove that the defendant had been convicted of a felony; a "felony" for purposes of O.C.G.A. § 16-11-133(a)(1) was any offense punishable by imprisonment for a term of one year or more. Verdree v. State, 299 Ga. App. 673, 683 S.E.2d 632 (2009).

Insufficient evidence of defendant as convicted felon.

- Trial court erred in convicting the defendant of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of O.C.G.A. § 16-11-133 because the evidence was insufficient to show that the defendant had been convicted of a prior felony; the state's exhibit showed that a "Derrick Beck" had been convicted of armed robbery, but nothing was presented to the jury to establish that Derrick Beck was the defendant. Mubarak v. State, 305 Ga. App. 419, 699 S.E.2d 788 (2010).

Defendant's sentence, as a recidivist, of concurrent 20 year terms on each of three counts of aggravated assault, concurrently five years terms on each of three counts of possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, to run consecutively to the aggravated assault sentence, and concurrent 15 year terms on each of two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon, to run consecutive to the aggravated assault sentence, was not cruel, inhumane, and unusual punishment because each sentence was within the statutory limits of the crimes charge, and the sentence was not grossly disproportionate to the underlying crimes. Willis v. State, 316 Ga. App. 258, 728 S.E.2d 857 (2012).

Failure to merge.

- Trial court erred in failing to merge, for purposes of sentencing, the defendant's convictions for possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon with use of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of another felony, because the same act was used to establish each of the offenses and each crime did not require proof of a fact not required by the other. Jones v. State, 318 Ga. App. 105, 733 S.E.2d 407 (2012).

Cited in Lawton v. State, 281 Ga. 459, 640 S.E.2d 14 (2007).

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 16-11-133

Total Results: 18  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Phillips v. State, 675 S.E.2d 1 (Ga. 2009).

Cited 69 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 9, 2009 | 285 Ga. 213, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1361

...f the robbery conviction which reflected that the initial charge had been armed robbery. At the time of the opening statement, appellant was facing a charge of being a convicted felon in possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime. OCGA § 16-11-133(b)....
...2008. Oral argument was heard on September 22, 2008. [2] The trial court withdrew this charge from the jury's consideration after determining that the felony for which appellant was convicted previously was not one of the felonies enumerated in OCGA § 16-11-133(b).
Copy

Atkinson v. State, 301 Ga. 518 (Ga. 2017).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 19, 2017 | 801 S.E.2d 833

...r attempted armed robbery, five consecutive years for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, and an additional fifteen consecutive years for commission of a crime by a convicted felon through the use of a firearm pursuant to OCGA § 16-11-133 — for a total sentence of life plus thirty years....
Copy

Threatt v. State, 293 Ga. 549 (Ga. 2013).

Cited 41 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 9, 2013 | 748 S.E.2d 400, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 2843

...State, *552277 Ga. 775, 776 (1) (596 SE2d 6) (2004). If Wyche were not an accomplice, no corroboration of his testimony would be required. Givens, 273 Ga. at 820 (1). The trial court may have thought that Threatt had been convicted of violating OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), which authorizes a sentence up to fifteen years for unlawful possession of a firearm by certain convicted felons during the commission of a crime....
...But that crime only concerns persons who have been convicted of certain enumerated felonies, and the felony of which Threatt had previously been convicted — burglary — is not among them. Moreover, the indictment makes clear that Threatt was charged in this case with violating OCGA § 16-11-106, not OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).
Copy

Moon v. State, 860 S.E.2d 519 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 25 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 21, 2021 | 312 Ga. 31

...ion of a firearm by a convicted felon.3 See Frazier, 308 Ga. at 452-453 (2) (a). However, as 3 Moon was convicted of four counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. Two of these, Counts 14 and 15, were charged pursuant to OCGA § 16-11-133 for Moon’s possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the murders of Pickels and Biancosino....
Copy

Brooks v. State, 847 S.E.2d 555 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 24, 2020 | 309 Ga. 630

FINAL COPY 309 Ga. 630 S20A0895. BROOKS v. THE STATE. BOGGS, Justice. Deontae Tremayne Brooks was convicted of malice murder, aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) in connection with the shooting death of Branden “Big B” Tinch and the aggravated assault of Lenard Gay. He was sentenced to life without the possibility of parole. He appeals, asserting three enumerations of error: insufficiency of the evidence to support his conviction under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), ineffective assistance of counsel, and trial court error in failing to grant his motion for mistrial. For the reasons stated below, we reverse Brooks’ conviction under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), affirm his convictions for malice murder and the aggravated assault of Gay, and remand the case to the trial court with direction to enter a judgment of conviction and sentence on the guilty verdicts for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11- 131, which the trial court originally merged into the conviction under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).1 1....
...of a firearm during the commission of a felony, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131, and possession of a firearm during commission of a crime against a person by a felon previously convicted of a crime involving a firearm under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b)....
...On May 15, 2018, Brooks was sentenced to serve life in prison without the possibility of parole, plus ten years in prison to be served concurrently on the conviction for aggravated assault involving Gay, and five years in prison to be served concurrently on the conviction under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), although that Code section mandates a fifteen-year consecutive sentence. The trial court merged the other aggravated assault count into the malice murder conviction and merged the remaining firearms counts into the conviction under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b); the felony murder charges were vacated by operation of law....
...Gay identified Brooks from a photo lineup, and Brooks was arrested in Ohio approximately one month later. (a) Brooks argues that the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction on Count 9, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of another felony enumerated under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b). Both the District Attorney and the Attorney General concede that the evidence adduced at trial was insufficient, and we agree. As part of the proof of a violation of OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), the State must present evidence that the defendant possessed a firearm in the commission of certain crimes after having been convicted of one of nine enumerated felonies or “any felony involving the use or possession of a firearm.” OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).3 Count 9 of the 3 OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) provides: Any person who has previously been convicted of or who has indictment charged Brooks with possessing a handgun during the commission of a felony against the person of another, see OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) (1), “said accused having been previously convicted of a felony involving the possession or use of a firearm on indictment number 06SC51346 in the Superior Court of Fulton County, on October 1, 2007.” At Brooks’ trial...
...justification by discharging a firearm from within a motor vehicle toward a person or persons. no witnesses from the 2007 case. The evidence presented at trial therefore was insufficient to authorize the jury to convict Brooks under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b)....
Copy

Marshall v. State, 848 S.E.2d 389 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 18 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 8, 2020 | 309 Ga. 698

...earm during the commission of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-106 (Count 11); possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131 (Count 12); and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-133 (Count 13). Marshall was tried from August 10 to 12, 2015, and the jury found him guilty of criminal trespass as a lesser included offense of second-degree criminal damage to property and guilty on all the other counts....
...Although the trial court further sentenced Marshall to life 7 Marshall’s argument regarding recidivist sentencing does not affect his remaining convictions. His 15-year consecutive sentence for possession of a firearm was mandated under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), without regard to his prior criminal history, and his conviction for the lesser included offense of criminal trespass, which is punishable as a misdemeanor under OCGA § 16-7-21 (d), was not subject to recidivist sentencing. 8 See Blackwell, 302 Ga....
Copy

Ellington v. State, 877 S.E.2d 221 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 9, 2022 | 314 Ga. 335

...e, possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-106, possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-133....
...d] the act.” OCGA § 16-5-70 (d) (2). Finally, Ellington’s conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of a felony required the State to prove, among other elements, that he possessed a firearm. See OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).5 To the extent Ellington challenges the sufficiency of the evidence related to counts that were merged for sentencing purposes or vacated by operation of law—felony murder, aggravated assault 5 Ellington’s chall...
...ton—i.e., that he committed the relevant acts; that he did so with malice aforethought—i.e., the requisite intent; and that he did so with knowledge that Meshiah was present and heard the act. See OCGA §§ 16-5-1 (a), (b); 16-15-70 (d) (2); 16-11-133 (b); Young v....
Copy

Lawton v. State, 640 S.E.2d 14 (Ga. 2007).

Cited 17 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 8, 2007 | 281 Ga. 459, 7 Fulton County D. Rep. 104, 7 FCDR 104

...guilty beyond a reasonable doubt of the crimes for which he was convicted. Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307, 99 S.Ct. 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Judgments affirmed. All the Justices concur. NOTES [1] Lawton was charged under and convicted of OCGA § 16-11-133(b) which provides: Any person who has previously been convicted of or who has previously entered a guilty plea to the offense of murder, armed robbery, kidnapping, rape, aggravated child molestation, aggravated sodomy, aggravated sexual...
...On August 20, 2002, a Richmond County grand jury indicted Lawton, along with Charles Hernell Hankerson, Lorenzo Dexter Lindsey, and William Rodriquez Abrams, for the malice murder of Marcus Taylor. Lawton was additionally indicted for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of a crime under OCGA § 16-11-133(b); Lindsey was also charged with criminal solicitation to commit murder....
Copy

Talley v. State, 875 S.E.2d 789 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 30, 2022 | 314 Ga. 153

...degree of Knight’s dwelling (Count 10), possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (Count 11), possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131 (Count 12), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-133 (Count 13). At a jury trial held from June 8 to 12, 2015, the trial court granted 1....
...which he argues would have prevented the introduction of evidence of a previous felony conviction at trial. Here, Talley was charged with two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon; one under OCGA § 16-11-131 (Count 12) and a second under OCGA § 16-11-133 (Count 13)....
Copy

Beamon v. State, 879 S.E.2d 457 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 4, 2022 | 314 Ga. 798

...iction thereof, shall be punished by confinement for a period of five years, such sentence to run consecutively to any other sentence which the person has received. 14 of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-133.7 See Atkinson, 301 Ga. at 521 (2); Jones, 318 Ga. App. at 110 (6). Here, however, Beamon was not charged under OCGA § 16-11-133 with possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony based on his status as a felon. Rather, Beamon was indicted on Count 16 for possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony under OCGA § 16-11-106, and on Count 21 for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131 (b). And we have clearly held that possession of 7 OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) provides: Any person who has previously been convicted of or who has previously entered a guilty plea to the offense of murder, murder in the second degree, armed robbery, home invasion in any degree, kidna...
Copy

Montanez v. State, 860 S.E.2d 551 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 11 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 21, 2021 | 311 Ga. 843

...incident in which they were killed. On appeal, Montanez argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient as a matter of due process to sustain his conviction as to one count of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b); that the evidence was insufficient to sustain any of his convictions because the testimony of his alleged accomplice was not corroborated, as required by Georgia law; and that his trial counsel provided constitutionally ineffective assistance....
...a stolen firearm, a felony. (a) Montanez argues that the evidence presented at trial was insufficient as a matter of constitutional due process to support his conviction for possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of OCGA § 16-11-133 (b)....
...le to the verdicts and asks whether any rational trier of fact could have found the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. See Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U. S. 307, 319 (III) (B) (99 SCt 2781, 61 LE2d 560) (1979). To prove a violation of OCGA § 16-11-133 (b), the State must present evidence that the defendant possessed a firearm in the commission of certain felonies after previously having been convicted of one of nine enumerated felonies or “any felony involving 10 the use or possession of a firearm.” OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).8 Count 21 of the indictment alleged that Montanez was in possession of a firearm, “having been previously convicted of a felony involving the possession or use of a firearm[.]” At trial, the State introduced its Exhibit 69, which was a copy of a sentencing order showing that Montanez had previously pled guilty to theft by receiving stolen property (a firearm), a felony, in 8 OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) provides: Any person who has previously been convicted of or who has previously entered a guilty plea to the offense of murder, murder in the second degree, armed robbery, home invasion in any degree, kidn...
...The State also presented evidence that Montanez then possessed a firearm during the commission of several crimes, including the murders of Caceres and Mederos-Vega. Accordingly, the evidence presented at trial was sufficient to sustain Montanez’s conviction for violating OCGA § 16-11-133 (b).10 (b) Montanez also argues that the evidence presented against 9 Although this exhibit in the original trial record transmitted to this Court was incomplete, the exhibit was supplemented and reflects Montanez’s prior...
Copy

Rouzan v. State, 843 S.E.2d 814 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 2020 | 308 Ga. 894

...med robbery, and felony murder based on aggravated assault. Appellant also was charged with possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony by a person previously convicted of a felony involving the use or possession of a firearm, see OCGA § 16-11-133 (b) (1), and Pontoon was charged with possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony, see OCGA § 16-11-106 (b) (1)....
Copy

Bowman v. State, 317 Ga. 457 (Ga. 2023).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 11, 2023

...during the commission of a felony (Counts 7 and 14), two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon under OCGA § 16-11-131 (Counts 8 and 15), two counts of possession of a firearm by a convicted felon through use of a fire- arm under OCGA § 16-11-133 (Counts 9 and 16), armed robbery (Count 10), and two counts of aggravated assault (Counts 11-12)....
... On appeal, Bowman contends that the trial court erred by (1) in- structing the jury on party to a crime, conspiracy, and provocation by words alone, and (2) failing to allow him to stipulate to his prior conviction to prove the required elements of Count 9, see OCGA § 16-11-133, without stipulating that the conviction involved the pos- session or use of a firearm....
...The case was docketed to the April 2023 term and submitted for a decision on the briefs. 2 argument about the stipulation fails because the State had to estab- lish that his prior conviction involved the use or possession of a fire- arm to prove that he violated OCGA § 16-11-133, so making him choose between having that element proven by stipulation or evi- dence did not violate the rule of Old Chief v....
...would not serve as a justification for murder. This claim of error fails. 3. Bowman contends that the trial court erred by not allowing him to stipulate to his prior conviction to prove Count 9, felon in possession of a firearm under OCGA § 16-11-133, without also stip- ulating that his prior felony involved the possession or use of a fire- arm. Count 9 of Bowman’s indictment charged him with committing a felony against the person of another while possessing a handgun and “having been previously convicted of a felony involving the pos- session or use of a firearm,” a violation of OCGA § 16-11-133....
...me or nature of the offense—outweighed its negligible probative value. See id. at 180-191 (II) (B). Bowman contends that the same is true here: his stipulation could have satisfied the State’s burden to prove the prior felony element of OCGA § 16-11-133, rendering further details about his prior conviction unnecessary, and so the risk of unfair prejudice from the jury hearing any such details outweighed their negligible probative value. As an initial matter, it is not clear from the record that Bow- man preserved this claim of error for review....
...has not argued that this claim was not preserved), Bowman’s argu- ment fails at its premise. His preferred stipulation—stipulating to a prior felony, but not to the fact that it involved a firearm—would not have satisfied the prior-felony element of OCGA § 16-11-133, which, as relevant to the indicted offense here, requires proof that the prior felony was “any felony involving the use or possession of a firearm.” 17 Indeed, in Brooks v. State, 309 Ga. 630 (847 SE2d 555) (2020), we held that the evidence to support a defendant’s OCGA § 16-11-133 conviction was insufficient because the stipulation to the defend- ant’s prior conviction failed to include that the prior conviction in- volved the possession or use of a firearm and the title of the crime did not suggest the possession or use of a firearm....
...prior conviction charged in Bowman’s indictment—the stipulation entered here appears to be about as narrowly tailored as it could be. In his reply, Bowman contends that his offer to stipulate “im- plicitly included a stipulation to all of the required elements under OCGA § 16-11-133.” But he offers no citation to the record for his assertion that his preferred stipulation could have been construed so broadly, and we see nothing in the record suggesting he offered to 18 stipulate to anything beyond the fact that he is a convicted felon, which, under Brooks, see 309 Ga. at 631-634 (1), would not have sat- isfied the State’s burden under OCGA § 16-11-133. 4....
Copy

Coast v. State, 826 S.E.2d 78 (Ga. 2019).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 11, 2019 | 305 Ga. 508

...f a firearm during the commission of a felony (OCGA § 16-11-106 ) (Count 3), felony murder predicated on possession of a firearm by a convicted felon (Count 4), and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon during the commission of a crime (OCGA § 16-11-133 ) (Count 5)....
Copy

Daniels v. State, 271 Ga. 167 (Ga. 1999).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jun 1, 1999 | 517 S.E.2d 66, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 2108

...21, 22 (494 SE2d 668) (1998). See OCGA § 48-2-60 (b). For this same reason, we also reject Daniels’s claims (1) that he could not have pled guilty to being a felon in possession of a firearm, when his earlier conviction had been disposed of under the First Offender Act, and (2) that OCGA § 16-11-133, which concerns sentencing for adjudicated felons convicted of firearms offenses, should not have been applied to him.
Copy

Morris v. State, 310 Ga. 443 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 2 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 12, 2020

Copy

Brown v. State, 847 S.E.2d 152 (Ga. 2020).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Aug 10, 2020 | 309 Ga. 511

...An Athens-Clarke County grand jury indicted Brown in April 2014, charging him with murder with malice aforethought, three counts of felony murder, two counts of aggravated assault, three counts of the unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a felony (under OCGA § 16-11-133 (b)), one count of terroristic acts, and one count of the unlawful possession of a firearm by a convicted felon....
Copy

Coast v. State, 305 Ga. 508 (Ga. 2019).

Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 11, 2019