Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1967, p. 844, § 1; Code 1933, § 26-3003, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1982, p. 3, § 16.)
Ga. L. 1967, p. 844, § 1 is not violative of U.S. Const., amend. 14. Nixdorf v. State, 226 Ga. 615, 176 S.E.2d 701 (1970).
Cited in State v. Birge, 240 Ga. 501, 241 S.E.2d 213 (1978); Drake v. State, 245 Ga. 798, 267 S.E.2d 237 (1980).
- Use of two-way communication system for monitoring all activity in a jail, operation of such system being known to each prisoner, would not necessarily deprive a prisoner of constitutional rights, provided there is no interception of conversations between attorney and client. 1970 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U70-84.
"Psychological stress evaluator" does not constitute an "eavesdropping device". 1972 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 72-163.
- What constitutes an "interception" of a telephone or similar communication forbidden by the Federal Communications Act (47 U.S.C. § 605) or similar state statutes, 9 A.L.R.3d 423.
No results found for Georgia Code 16-11-63.