Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Ga. L. 1967, p. 844, § 1; Code 1933, § 26-3005, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 16; Ga. L. 1991, p. 1040, § 1.)
- License to use telephone service observing equipment may be revoked upon proof that licensee is recording conversations on grounds that the activity is contrary to purposes and uses for which license was issued. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-103.
Recording of conversations is not authorized by commission's grant of authority to intercept as use of term "recording" is not included within term "interception" by enabling legislation. 1976 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 76-103.
- 74 Am. Jur. 2d, Telecommunications, § 21.
- Mode of establishing that information obtained by illegal wiretapping has or has not led to evidence introduced by prosecution, 28 A.L.R.2d 1055.
Sufficiency of identification of participants as prerequisite to admissibility of telephone conversation in evidence, 79 A.L.R.3d 79.
State or municipal liability for invasion of privacy, 87 A.L.R.3d 145.
Permissible surveillance, under state communications interception statute, by person other than state or local law enforcement officer or one acting in concert with officer, 24 A.L.R.4th 1208.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-03-02
Citation: 376 S.E.2d 368, 259 Ga. 41
Snippet: Public Service Commission regulations, OCGA § 16-11-65, are not relevant here. Secretly recorded conversations