Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 26-9913, enacted by Ga. L. 1978, p. 2199, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 149, § 16; Ga. L. 1999, p. 81, § 16.)
- Definition of "drug related objects" in O.C.G.A. § 16-13-1 provides adequate notice of the persons covered and conduct proscribed and is not therefore void for vagueness. High Ol' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 673 F.2d 1225 (11th Cir. 1982).
- Court's refusal to give charge to jury that defendant's explanation was to be taken into consideration insofar as it was consistent with properly admitted circumstantial evidence was not error where instruction was given to the jury regarding presumption of defendant's innocence and regarding the state's burden of proof to prove defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt. Upshaw v. State, 172 Ga. App. 671, 324 S.E.2d 529 (1984).
- Consumer of controlled substances may not recover damages for injuries sustained in an automobile accident after taking the drugs, when the provider had taken the drugs from the pharmacy in which the provider worked, and the consumer should have foreseen the possibility of an accident after using drugs. Guy v. McKenzie, 195 Ga. App. 670, 394 S.E.2d 576 (1990).
Cited in High Ol' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 449 F. Supp. 364 (N.D. Ga. 1978); High Ol' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 456 F. Supp. 1035 (N.D. Ga. 1978); High Ol' Times, Inc. v. Busbee, 621 F.2d 135 (5th Cir. 1980); Hill v. Morrison, 160 Ga. App. 151, 286 S.E.2d 467 (1981); Gunn v. State, 163 Ga. App. 906, 296 S.E.2d 221 (1982); Todd v. Byrd, 283 Ga. App. 37, 640 S.E.2d 652 (2006).
- 25 Am. Jur. 2d, Drugs and Controlled Substances, §§ 19 et seq., 40 et seq. 32 Am. Jur. 2d, False Pretenses, § 7.
- Uniform Controlled Substances Act (U.L.A.) § 101 et seq.
- Prosecutions based upon alleged illegal possession of instruments to be used in violation of narcotics laws, 92 A.L.R.3d 47.
Propriety of instruction of jury on "conscious avoidance" of knowledge of nature of substance or transaction in prosecution for possession or distribution of drugs, 109 A.L.R. Fed. 710.
Total Results: 4
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-06-21
Snippet: of molestation allegedly occurred. See OCGA § 16-13-1. As recounted above, Wilson did not make this argument
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-02-10
Citation: 576 S.E.2d 897, 276 Ga. 212, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 111
Snippet: article [Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-1 et seq.] shall be, upon conviction thereof, punished
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1985-09-12
Citation: 334 S.E.2d 173, 254 Ga. 697, 1985 Ga. LEXIS 829
Snippet: the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-1 et seq., largely on evidence furnished by his female
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-02-06
Citation: 311 S.E.2d 823, 252 Ga. 181, 1984 Ga. LEXIS 609
Snippet: the Georgia Controlled Substances Act, OCGA § 16-13-1 et seq. (Code Ann. § 26-9913 et seq.). Prior to