Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448A person may be convicted of the offense of criminal attempt if the crime attempted was actually committed in pursuance of the attempt but may not be convicted of both the criminal attempt and the completed crime.
(Code 1933, § 26-1004, enacted by Ga. L. 1968, p. 1249, § 1.)
- Aggravated assault with intent to commit murder and with a deadly weapon may be charged as lesser included offenses of murder. Hall v. State, 163 Ga. App. 515, 295 S.E.2d 194 (1982).
When an attempt to commit one crime can only be proved by proof of another, greater, consummated crime, the attempt of the former cannot possibly be "included" in or "lesser" than the latter. Cannon v. State, 167 Ga. App. 225, 305 S.E.2d 910 (1983).
- It is intent of legislature that although assault may be a criminal attempt, and even though criminal act intended be completed, a conviction for assault is authorized. Williams v. State, 141 Ga. App. 201, 233 S.E.2d 48 (1977).
- Recognizing fact that assault is nothing more than an attempted battery, (and thus that every battery necessarily includes an assault) by virtue of O.C.G.A. §§ 16-4-2 and16-5-22, it is presently lawful to convict for simple assault even though proof shows that a battery was committed. C.L.T. v. State, 157 Ga. App. 180, 276 S.E.2d 862 (1981).
- Trial court did not err by refusing to charge the jury that the jury could find the defendant guilty of attempted armed robbery as an included offense of aggravated assault with intent to rob since the defendant was not entitled to a charge or verdict of attempted armed robbery when that offense could only be proved by showing that the defendant brandished a weapon in the faces of the victims with the intent to rob the victims, that is, that the defendant actually committed the greater offense, a completed aggravated assault with the intent to rob. Since the evidence that proved that the defendant committed an attempted armed robbery necessarily proved that the defendant committed the greater, completed crime of aggravated assault with intent to rob, there was no evidence that the defendant committed only the offense of attempted armed robbery and, therefore, the defendant was not entitled to a charge on that lesser included offense. Pilkington v. State, 298 Ga. App. 317, 680 S.E.2d 164 (2009), cert. denied, No. S09C1717, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 54 (Ga. 2010).
- Legislative purpose of the Georgia Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, O.C.G.A. § 16-14-1 et seq. does not preclude recovery for personal injuries. Reaugh v. Inner Harbour Hosp., 214 Ga. App. 259, 447 S.E.2d 617 (1994).
- See Plummer v. State, 168 Ga. App. 108, 308 S.E.2d 210 (1983).
- Because the defendant's seven attempted armed robbery convictions involved different victims than the defendant's 13 completed armed robberies, the defendant victimized 20 separate individuals and, thus, the defendant was properly convicted and sentenced on each of the 20 counts. Houston v. State, 302 Ga. 35, 805 S.E.2d 34 (2017).
Cited in Bearden v. State, 122 Ga. App. 25, 176 S.E.2d 243 (1970); Adams v. State, 129 Ga. App. 839, 201 S.E.2d 649 (1973); Jones v. State, 238 Ga. 51, 230 S.E.2d 865 (1976); Scott v. State, 141 Ga. App. 848, 234 S.E.2d 685 (1977); Printup v. State, 142 Ga. App. 42, 234 S.E.2d 840 (1977); Harper v. State, 157 Ga. App. 480, 278 S.E.2d 28 (1981); Schwerdtfeger v. State, 167 Ga. App. 19, 305 S.E.2d 834 (1983); Parham v. State, 218 Ga. App. 42, 460 S.E.2d 78 (1995); Spivey v. State, 243 Ga. App. 785, 534 S.E.2d 498 (2000); Sewell v. State, 244 Ga. App. 449, 536 S.E.2d 173 (2000); Colbert v. State, 255 Ga. App. 182, 564 S.E.2d 787 (2002); Calloway v. State, 303 Ga. 48, 810 S.E.2d 105 (2018).
- 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law, §§ 21, 154.
- 42 C.J.S., Indictments and Informations, § 303.
- Conviction or acquittal of attempt to commit particular crime as bar to prosecution for conspiracy to commit same crime, or vice versa, 53 A.L.R.2d 622.
Attempt to commit assault as criminal offense, 79 A.L.R.2d 597.
Application of felony-murder doctrine where the felony relied upon is an includible offense with the homicide, 40 A.L.R.3d 1341.
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2021-06-01
Snippet: offense of attempting to purchase it. See OCGA § 16-4-2 (“A person may be convicted of the offense of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-02-05
Citation: 810 S.E.2d 105
Snippet: offense of the substantive offense. See OCGA § 16-4-2 ("A person ... may not be convicted of both the
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-09-13
Citation: 302 Ga. 35, 805 S.E.2d 34, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 777
Snippet: robberies (Counts 1-4, 14-16, 38-42, and 53). SeeOCGA § 16-4-2 (“Aperson... may not be convicted of both the criminal