O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-9-36.1 (2019)

Criminal factoring of financial transaction card records

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Unauthorized use of financial transaction card; misuse of government issued cards. Punishment and penalties. Publication of information regarding schemes, devices, means, or methods for financial transaction card fraud or theft of telecommunication services. Venue determinations.

Deposit account fraud. Printing, executing, or negotiating checks, drafts, orders, or debit card sales drafts knowing information thereon to be in error, fictitious, or assigned to another account holder. Article 3

Illegal Use of Financial Transaction Cards

Definitions. Financial transaction card theft. Forgery of financial transaction card. Financial transaction card fraud. Criminal possession of financial transaction card forgery devices. Criminal receipt of goods and services fraudulently obtained. Rebuttable presumption of criminal receipt of goods and services fraudulently obtained.

Deceptive business practices. Destruction, removal, concealment, encumbrance, or transfer of property subject to security interest. Improper solicitation of money. Damaging, destroying, or secreting property to defraud another. False statements by telephone solicitors. Fraudulently obtaining or attempting to obtain public housing or reduction in public housing rent. Fraudulent attempts to obtain refunds. False representation as representative of peace officer organization or fire service organization. Failing to pay for natural products or chattels. Operation of credit repair services organization. ‘‘Foreclosure fraud’’ construed; penalty. Misrepresenting the origin or ownership of timber or agricultural commodities. Crimes utilizing automated sales suppression devices,

CRIMES AND OFFENSES PART 3

Sec.

zapper, or phantom-ware; penalties. False representation as veteran. Article 5

Removal or Alteration of Identification from Property

Criminal use of an article with an altered identification mark. Removal of collars or identifying items or marks on animals. Article 6

PART 4 INTERNET AND E-MAIL FRAUD

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: Polly v. State, 748 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
Polly v. State, 748 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 16-9-36.1. OCGA § 16-8-4. OCGA § 16-8-2.”
Randy Polly v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “As a special condition of his probation, Polly was required, among other things, to pay 1 OCGA § 16-9-36.1. 2 OCGA § 16-8-4. 3 OCGA § 16-8-2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.