O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 16-9-36.1 (2019)

Criminal factoring of financial transaction card records

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Any person who, without the acquirer's express authorization, employs or solicits an authorized merchant or any agent or employee of such merchant to remit to an issuer or acquirer, for payment, a financial transaction card record of a sale, which sale was not made by such merchant, agent, or employee, commits the offense of criminal factoring of financial transaction card records. Conviction of criminal factoring of financial transaction card records shall be punishable as provided in subsection (b) of Code Section 16-9-38.

History

(Code 1981, § 16-9-36.1, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 304, § 3.)

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2013–2013 · leading case: Polly v. State, 748 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Polly v. State, 748 S.E.2d 696 (Ga. Ct. App. 2013). · cites it 2× “OCGA § 16-9-36.1. OCGA § 16-8-4. OCGA § 16-8-2.”
Randy Polly v. State, No. A13A0825 (Ga. Ct. App. Sept. 20, 2013). · cites it 2× “As a special condition of his probation, Polly was required, among other things, to pay 1 OCGA § 16-9-36.1. 2 OCGA § 16-8-4. 3 OCGA § 16-8-2.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.