Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-1-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 1. General Provisions, 17-1-1 through 17-1-4.

17-1-2. Maintenance of penal actions.

A "penal action" is an action allowed in pursuance of public justice under particular laws. If no special officer is authorized to be the plaintiff therein, the state, the Governor, the Attorney General, or the prosecuting attorney may be the plaintiff.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 3178; Code 1868, § 3189; Code 1873, § 3254; Code 1882, § 3254; Civil Code 1895, § 4933; Civil Code 1910, § 5510; Code 1933, § 3-103.)

Cross references.

- Corresponding provisions relating to civil procedure, §§ 9-2-1,9-2-29.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

State, not victim, has interest in criminal prosecutions.

- Because the purpose of criminal law is to serve the public functions of deterrence, rehabilitation, and retribution, it is the state, not the victim, that has an interest in criminal prosecutions. Ambles v. State, 259 Ga. 406, 383 S.E.2d 555 (1989).

Trial court abused the court's discretion by dismissing charges alleging that the defendant violated state statutes prohibiting affrays, disrupting a public school, and criminal trespass by fighting on school grounds, over the state's objection, after defense counsel told the court that school officials wanted the charges dismissed. State v. Perry, 261 Ga. App. 886, 583 S.E.2d 909 (2003).

Action by informer generally impermissible.

- Qui tam action, in accordance with this section, cannot be brought and prosecuted in the name of the informer unless a right thus to sue shall have been given distinctly by statute. O'Kelly v. Athens Mfg. Co., 36 Ga. 51 (1867).

No inherent right of informant to forfeiture in criminal case.

- Informer who commences a qui tam action under a penal statute does not acquire thereby a vested right to the forfeiture. Bank of St. Mary's v. State, 12 Ga. 475 (1853); Robison v. Beall, 26 Ga. 1 (1858); Hargroves v. Chambers, 30 Ga. 580 (1860).

Cited in Malone v. Clark, 109 Ga. App. 134, 135 S.E.2d 517 (1964).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 1 Am. Jur. 2d, Actions, § 1 et seq., 43 et seq. 59 Am. Jur. 2d, Parties, §§ 24, 26.

C.J.S.

- 1A C.J.S., Actions, § 1 et seq. 7A C.J.S., Attorney General, § 65 et seq.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 17-1-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 8

In the Matter of Jonathan Reuven Melnick

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-08-13

Snippet: violations of Rules 17 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, and 1.5 where there were a number of

Anthony v. American General Financial Services, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-06-28

Citation: 697 S.E.2d 166, 287 Ga. 448, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2051, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 478

Snippet: affirmation, and the certification of a copy.” OCGA § 45-17-1 (2). Under the current version of OCGA § 45-17-20

Smith v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-10-26

Citation: 508 S.E.2d 145, 270 Ga. 68, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3594, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 1005

Snippet: 465 S.E.2d 677 (1996); Johnson v. State, 260 Ga. 17 (1, 2), 389 S.E.2d 238 (1990). 2. Smith enumerates as

Lewy v. Beazley

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-10-22

Citation: 270 Ga. 11, 507 S.E.2d 721, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 3477, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 993

Snippet: 21-2-183 (b). OCGA § 45-17-8 (c). See OCGA § 45-17-1 (2). Poppell, supra. OCGA § 21-2-50 (10).

Ambles v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-09-11

Citation: 383 S.E.2d 555, 259 Ga. 406

Snippet: Constitution of 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Par. II; OCGA § 17-1-2. Because the purpose of criminal law is to serve

Thurmond v. Thurmond

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1934-11-16

Citation: 179 Ga. 831, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 419, 177 S.E. 719

Snippet: thence S. 68 W. 25.92 to a rock on road, thence N. 17-1/2 W. 3.43 to a rock, ■thence S. 63 W. 3.73 to a rock

Dixon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1900-03-02

Citation: 110 Ga. 173

Snippet: on the River street track to the waterworks was 17 1/2 cents a ton. The railroad commission rate for a

Dixon v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1900-03-02

Citation: 110 Ga. 173, 35 S.E. 369, 1900 Ga. LEXIS 343

Snippet: on the River street track to the waterworks was 17 1/2 cents a ton. The railroad commission rate for a