Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-10-38 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 17-10-38 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 17-10-38

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 10. Sentence and Punishment, 17-10-1 through 17-10-71.

ARTICLE 2 DEATH PENALTY GENERALLY

17-10-38. Death sentences generally.

  1. All persons who have been convicted of a capital offense and have had imposed upon them a sentence of death shall suffer such punishment by lethal injection. Lethal injection is the continuous intravenous injection of a substance or substances sufficient to cause death into the body of the person sentenced to death until such person is dead.
  2. In all cases in which the defendant is sentenced to death, it shall be the duty of the trial judge in passing sentence to direct that the defendant be delivered to the Department of Corrections for execution of the death sentence at a state correctional institution designated by the department.
  3. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, prescription, preparation, compounding, dispensing, or administration of a lethal injection authorized by a sentence of death by a court of competent jurisdiction shall not constitute the practice of medicine or any other profession relating to health care which is subject by law to regulation, licensure, or certification.
  4. No state agency, department, or official may, through regulation or otherwise, require or compel a physician to participate in the execution of a death sentence. "To participate in the execution of a death sentence" means any of the following actions: selecting injection sites; starting an intravenous line or lines as a port for a lethal injection device; prescribing, preparing, administering, or supervising injection drugs or their doses or types; inspecting, testing, or maintaining lethal injection devices; or consulting with or supervising lethal injection personnel.

(Ga. L. 1924, p. 195, § 1; Code 1933, § 27-2512; Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 330, § 1; Ga. L. 1985, p. 283, § 1; Ga. L. 2000, p. 947, § 3.)

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2000, p. 947, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "It is the intention of the General Assembly to provide for execution by lethal injection for persons sentenced to death after conviction of capital crimes committed on or after May 1, 2000. It is the further intention of the General Assembly that persons sentenced to death for crimes committed prior to the effective date of this Act be executed by lethal injection if the Supreme Court of the United States declares that electrocution violates the Constitution of the United States or if the Supreme Court of Georgia declares that electrocution violates the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of Georgia."

Ga. L. 2000, p. 947, § 6, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "Section 3 of this Act shall apply to persons sentenced to death for crimes committed on or after May 1, 2000. Code Section 17-10-38 as it existed prior to its amendment by Section 3 of this Act shall continue to apply with respect to crimes committed prior to May 1, 2000, except that Section 3 of this Act shall apply to all persons sentenced to death for crimes committed prior to May 1, 2000, if the Supreme Court of the United States declares that electrocution violates the Constitution of the United States or if the Supreme Court of Georgia declares that electrocution violates the Constitution of the United States or the Constitution of Georgia."

Law reviews.

- For article, "The Constitutional Right not to Kill," see 62 Emory L.J. 121 (2012).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

For challenge of Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 330, § 1 on ex post facto grounds, see Benton v. State, 187 Ga. 149, 199 S.E. 749 (1939).

Allegation that section violates separation of powers provision.

- Allegation that this section was unconstitutional, null, and void because the statute supposedly violated Ga. Const. 1877, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XXIII (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. II, Para. III), presented no question for judicial determination since the statute failed to point out wherein the Act was repugnant to and in conflict with that constitutional provision. Williams v. State, 187 Ga. 415, 1 S.E.2d 27 (1939).

Ga. L. 1937-38, Ex. Sess., p. 330,

§ 1 not unconstitutional. - This section was not unconstitutional as violative of Ga. Const. 1877, Art. III, Sec. I, Para. I (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. V, Para. IV) to the effect that no law shall be amended or repealed by mere reference to its title or section number. Williams v. State, 187 Ga. 415, 1 S.E.2d 27 (1939).

Variance between title and subject matter of legislation.

- Ga. L. 1924, p. 195 did not contain matter not expressed in its caption, in violation of Ga. Const. 1877, Art. III, Sec. VII, Para. VIII (see Ga. Const. 1983, Art. III, Sec. V, Para. III). Howell v. State, 164 Ga. 204, 138 S.E. 206, appeal dismissed, 275 U.S. 576, 48 S. Ct. 114, 72 L. Ed. 435 (1927).

Manner in which capital sentences executed is for legislative enactment.

- There being no provision in the Constitution conferring upon sheriffs of counties the power to execute sentences of the courts in capital cases, the manner of execution of such sentences is for legislative enactment. Dunaway v. Gore, 154 Ga. 219, 138 S.E. 213 (1927).

Constitutionality of electrocution.

- As electrocution inflicts purposeless violence and needless mutilation, in violation of the proscription of cruel and unusual punishments of Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XV., future executions of death sentences are to be carried out by lethal injection only. Dawson v. State, 274 Ga. 327, 554 S.E.2d 137 (2001).

Relationship to O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33. - In a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 case in which a death row inmate challenged Georgia's three-drug lethal injection method, the complaint was untimely; the complaint was governed by the two-year statute of limitations found in O.C.G.A. § 9-3-33, and the inmate's claim accrued in 2001 when the General Assembly adopted lethal injection as Georgia's method of execution of death sentences as found in O.C.G.A. § 17-10-38. Alderman v. Donald, F.3d (11th Cir. Sept. 3, 2008)(Unpublished).

Changes made in 2013 were not substantial changes to Georgia's execution protocol and the defendant's method-of-execution claim accrued in October 2001 and must have been filed by October 2003 to be timely; the defendant's federal complaint challenging lethal injection, filed on May 12, 2017, was over ten years too late. Ledford v. Comm'r, Ga. Dep't of Corr., 856 F.3d 1312 (11th Cir. 2017).

Cited in Esposito v. State, 273 Ga. 183, 538 S.E.2d 55 (2000); Hill v. Owens, 292 Ga. 380, 738 S.E.2d 56 (2013).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Designation by Commissioner of place of execution.

- Commissioner of offender rehabilitation (now commissioner of corrections) is authorized to designate any state correctional institution as the place for carrying out an execution. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 80-121.

State correctional institution defined.

- State correctional institution is any facility used to punish criminal offenders. 1980 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 80-121.

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law, §§ 747, 748, 750.

C.J.S.

- 24 C.J.S., Criminal Law, § 2110 et seq.

ALR.

- Substantive challenges to propriety of execution by lethal injection in state capital proceedings, 21 A.L.R.6th 1.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 17-10-38 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 8

Hill v. Owens

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-02-04

Citation: 292 Ga. 380, 738 S.E.2d 56, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 168, 2013 WL 399003, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 108

Snippet: constitute the practice of medicine. See OCGA § 17-10-38 (c). In light of the foregoing, we conclude that

Humphrey v. Wilson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-26

Citation: 652 S.E.2d 501, 282 Ga. 520

Snippet: In 2001, our General Assembly amended OCGA § 17-10-38 to provide that lethal injection would replace

Lucas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-11-19

Citation: 555 S.E.2d 440, 274 Ga. 640, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3495, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 906

Snippet: by lethal injection in accordance with OCGA § 17-10-38, as amended. 22. Because Lucas presented no evidence

Head v. Ferrell

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-10-22

Citation: 554 S.E.2d 155, 274 Ga. 399, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 3163, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 825

Snippet: by lethal injection in accordance with OCGA § 17-10-38, as amended. Judgment affirmed in part and reversed

Dawson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-10-05

Citation: 554 S.E.2d 137, 274 Ga. 327, 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 2950, 2001 Ga. LEXIS 785

Snippet: all condemned prisoners when it amended OCGA § 17-10-38. They have determined that this amendment reflects

Colwell v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2001-03-02

Citation: 544 S.E.2d 120, 273 Ga. 634

Snippet: electrocution is the statutory method of execution. OCGA § 17-10-38. Should electrocution be declared unconstitutional

Davis v. Turpin

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-11-13

Citation: 539 S.E.2d 129, 273 Ga. 244, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4199, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 858

Snippet: affirmatively elected, effective January 14, 2000); OCGA § 17-10-38 (providing for execution by lethal injection for

Esposito v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-10-30

Citation: 538 S.E.2d 55, 273 Ga. 183

Snippet: SE2d 37) (1995); OCGA § 24-3-50. See OCGA § 17-10-38 (providing for execution by lethal injection);