Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448In addition to rules adopted by the Governor, the following rules shall be observed as a condition precedent to obtaining a requisition by him for the extradition of any fugitive from the justice of this state:
(Ga. L. 1884-85, p. 141, § 1; Penal Code 1895, § 1275; Penal Code 1910, § 1357; Code 1933, § 44-101; Ga. L. 1983, p. 884, § 3-22.)
- Court considering release on habeas corpus can do no more than decide whether extradition documents on their face are in order, whether petitioner has been charged with a crime in the demanding state, whether the petitioner is the person named in the request for extradition, and whether the petitioner is a fugitive. The court may not look beyond the demanding state's charges to determine if the extradition request was a pretext to enable that state to commit the petitioner civilly. Oliver v. Barrett, 269 Ga. 512, 500 S.E.2d 908 (1998).
Cited in Dobbs v. Anderson, 170 Ga. 826, 154 S.E. 342 (1930); Brown v. State, 243 Ga. App. 430, 533 S.E.2d 453 (2000).
- Extradition: mission or motive of defendant in going to asylum state as affecting right to extradite him, 13 A.L.R. 415.
One charged with desertion or failure to support wife or child as fugitive from justice, subject to extradition, 32 A.L.R. 1167; 54 A.L.R. 281.
Motive or ulterior purpose of officials demanding or granting extradition as proper subject of inquiry, 94 A.L.R. 1493.
Constitutionality, construction, and application of statute authorizing extradition of one who commits an act within the state or a third state resulting in a crime in the demanding state, 151 A.L.R. 239.
Determination, in extradition proceedings, or on habeas corpus in such proceedings, whether a crime is charged, 40 A.L.R.2d 1151.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-06-01
Citation: 500 S.E.2d 908, 269 Ga. 512
Snippet: 252 S.E.2d 453 (1979). Thus, even though OCGA § 17-13-1(1) requires that extradition to the demanding state