O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-17-13 (2019)

Notification to victim of impending parole, release for period exceeding 60 days, or pardon; notice of hearing on request to commute death sentence

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The State Board of Pardons and Paroles shall give 20 days’ advance notification to a victim whenever it considers making a final decision to grant parole, release a defendant for a period exceeding 60 days, or grant a pardon; and the board shall provide the victim with an opportunity to file a written objection to such action. Within 72 hours of receiving a request to commute a death sentence, the State Board of Pardons and Paroles shall provide notification to a victim of the date set for hearing such request and provide such victim an opportunity to file a written response to such request. No notification to the victim need be given unless the victim has expressed a desire for such notification and has provided the State Board of Pardons and Paroles with a current mailing or e-mail address and telephone number. Failure of the victim to inform the board of a change of address or telephone number shall not void a decision of the board.

History

Code 1981, § 17-17-13, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 385, § 2; Ga. L. 2015, p. 207, § 1/HB 71.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Billy Edgar Murrell v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2021).
Billy Edgar Murrell v. State (Ga. Ct. App. 2021). · cites it 4× “9 Even so, the State appears to hinge the trial court’s jurisdiction to consider its motion to clarify Murrell’s sentence on OCGA § 17-7-1 (5),13 OCGA § 17-17-13,14 and a statement from an attorney with the Department of Corrections that it needed something in writing that would…”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.