Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §17-2-4, enacted by Ga. L. 1995, p. 1250, § 1; Ga. L. 2017, p. 471, § 2/HB 343.)
The 2017 amendment, effective July 1, 2017, substituted "guilty but with intellectual disability" for "guilty but mentally retarded" throughout this Code section.
- For annual survey on criminal law, see 69 Mercer L. Rev. 73 (2017). For note on the 1995 enactment of this Code section, see 12 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 144 (1995).
- Venue is not a fact to which the state is required to stipulate whenever the defendant wishes to do so, particularly when the state disbelieves the defendant's account of that fact, because stipulations and waivers of jurisdictional defenses streamline a proceeding in which both parties agree on a fact, making further proof unnecessary; stipulations and jurisdictional waivers are not a means of forcing an opposing party to agree to facts the opposing party believes are not true and would mislead the factfinder. If the facts are disputed, the parties' competing evidence and arguments can be presented to the factfinder to resolve. State v. Dixon, 286 Ga. 706, 691 S.E.2d 207 (2010).
- Court of appeals erred in reversing the defendant's conviction for armed robbery because the trial court properly declined to instruct the jury on the lesser included offense of theft by taking since there was no evidence that the included crime was committed in the county in which the defendant was being tried; although the state was unwilling to allow the defendant to waive venue or stipulate that what occurred was a theft by taking that happened entirely in Clayton County, the defendant was free to present evidence and argue to the jury that while the defendant was guilty of committing theft by taking in Clayton County, the defendant was not guilty of armed robbery in DeKalb County. But the defendant could not require the state to agree that the defendant committed theft by taking in Clayton County or require the trial court to instruct the jury on a lesser included offense over which the court lacked venue. State v. Dixon, 286 Ga. 706, 691 S.E.2d 207 (2010).
Total Results: 3
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-29
Citation: 291 Ga. 821, 733 S.E.2d 750, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3353, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 852
Snippet: case with the prosecutor’s approval. See OCGA § 17-2-4 (a) (authorizing a “defendant arrested, *823held
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-03-15
Citation: 691 S.E.2d 207, 286 Ga. 706, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 764, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 226
Snippet: 2d 31. In accordance with this principle, OCGA § 17-2-4(b) authorizes a defendant arrested, held, or present
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-06-02
Citation: 581 S.E.2d 536, 276 Ga. 669, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1704, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 534
Snippet: Jones, 272 Ga. at 905, 537 S.E.2d 80. [9] OCGA § 17-2-4 (defendant wishing to plead guilty may waive venue)