Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-20-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 20. Identification Procedures for Live Lineups, Photo Lineups, and Showups, 17-20-1 through 17-20-3.

ARTICLE 2 MISDEMEANOR CASES

17-20-2. Written policies for live line-ups, photo line-ups, and showups.

  1. Not later than July 1, 2016, any law enforcement agency that conducts live lineups, photo lineups, or showups shall adopt written policies for using such procedures for the purpose of determining whether a witness identifies someone as the perpetrator of an alleged crime.
  2. Live lineup, photo lineup, and showup policies shall include the following:
    1. With respect to a live lineup, having an individual who does not know the identity of the suspect conduct the live procedure;
    2. With respect to a photo lineup, having an individual:
      1. Who does not know the identity of the suspect conduct the photo lineup; or
      2. Who knows the identity of the suspect use a procedure in which photographs are placed in folders, randomly shuffled, and then presented to the witness so that the individual conducting such procedure cannot physically see which photograph is being viewed by the witness until the procedure is complete;
    3. Providing the witness with instruction that the perpetrator of the alleged crime may or may not be present in the live lineup or photo lineup;
    4. Composing a live lineup or photo lineup so that the fillers generally resemble the witness's description of the perpetrator of the alleged crime;
    5. Using a minimum of four fillers in a live lineup and a minimum of five fillers in a photo lineup; and
    6. Having the individual conducting a live lineup, photo lineup, or showup seek and document, at the time that an identification of an individual or photograph is made, and in the witness's own words without necessarily referencing a numeric or percentage standard, a clear statement from the witness as to the witness's confidence level that the individual or photograph identified is the individual or photograph of the individual who committed the alleged crime.
  3. All law enforcement agency written policies adopted pursuant to this Code section shall be subject to public disclosure and inspection notwithstanding any provision to the contrary in Article 4 of Chapter 18 of Title 50.

(Code 1981, §17-20-2, enacted by Ga. L. 2015, p. 1046, § 4/SB 94.)

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Criminal defendant's age or height as factor in determination of whether circumstances of witness's identification of defendant in photographic array shown by police to witness were impermissibly suggestive as matter of federal constitutional law, 102 A.L.R.6th 365.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 17-20-2

Total Results: 11  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

State v. Lane, 838 S.E.2d 808 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 230 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 10, 2020 | 308 Ga. 10

Copy

McELRATH v. State, 839 S.E.2d 573 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 35 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 28, 2020 | 308 Ga. 104

Copy

Dryden v. State, 676 S.E.2d 175 (Ga. 2009).

Cited 19 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 28, 2009 | 285 Ga. 281, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 1526

Copy

Hubbard v. State, 683 S.E.2d 602 (Ga. 2009).

Cited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 28, 2009 | 285 Ga. 791, 2009 Fulton County D. Rep. 3074

Copy

Davis v. State, 296 Ga. 126 (Ga. 2014).

Cited 12 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 3, 2014 | 765 S.E.2d 336

Copy

Harris v. State, 872 S.E.2d 732 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 3, 2022 | 313 Ga. 653

Copy

Roseboro v. State, 841 S.E.2d 706 (Ga. 2020).

Cited 10 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Apr 6, 2020 | 308 Ga. 428

...v. State, 286 Ga. 884, 888 (692 SE2d 374) (2010) (citation and punctuation omitted). To argue that the prosecutor used an unduly suggestive identification procedure here, Roseboro points to the prosecutor’s alleged noncompliance with OCGA § 17-20-2,7 a Georgia statute that 7 OCGA § 17-20-2 (a) and (b) provide: (a) Not later than July 1, 2016, any law enforcement agency that conducts live lineups, photo lineups, or showups shall adopt written policies for using such procedures for the purpose of det...
... requires law enforcement agencies to adopt written policies for photo lineups (as well as “live lineups” and “showups”), to argue that the prosecutor showing Ellison photos on Anderson’s phone was impermissibly suggestive. However, even assuming that OCGA § 17-20-2 applies here and that the prosecutor failed to comply with it, noncompliance with the statute would not result in the automatic exclusion of Ellison’s identification....
Copy

Anderson v. State, 869 S.E.2d 401 (Ga. 2022).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 15, 2022 | 313 Ga. 178

...Pay no attention to markings or numbers appearing in any particular photograph. Please do not discuss with witnesses whether or not you have selected a photograph during this showing. 9 We note that this procedure appears to comport with guidelines set forth in OCGA § 17-20-2, which requires law enforcement agencies to establish a policy for the conduct of live lineups, photo lineups, and “showups.” With respect to photo lineups, such policy must include having an individual who does not know the identity o...
...Moreover, when Agee saw Anderson in Newton’s apartment, Anderson was wearing a hat and presented to the witness so that the individual conducting such procedure cannot physically see which photograph is being viewed by the witness until the procedure is complete[.]” OCGA § 17-20-2 (b) (2) (B). The person administering the lineup is also to instruct the witness “that the perpetrator of the alleged crime may or may not be present in the . . . photo lineup[.]” OCGA § 17-20-2 (b) (3). The photo lineup should be composed such that the fillers “generally resemble the witness’s description of the perpetrator of the alleged crime[,]” OCGA § 17-20-2 (b) (4), and should have a minimum of five fillers. OCGA § 17-20-2 (b) (5)....
...necessarily referencing a numeric or percentage standard, a clear statement from the witness as to the witness’s confidence level that the . . . photograph identified is the . . . photograph of the individual who committed the alleged crime. OCGA § 17-20-2 (b) (6)....
Copy

Kirkland v. State, 854 S.E.2d 508 (Ga. 2021).

Cited 6 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 1, 2021 | 310 Ga. 738

...t to any challenge to an identification; provided however, that such failure shall not mandate the exclusion of identification evidence.”). See also Roseboro v. State, 308 Ga. 428, 433-434 (2) (a) (841 SE2d 706) (2020) (even assuming that OCGA § 17-20-2 applies to a procedure in which a photo lineup was conducted using pictures on a phone, non-compliance with the statute would not result in the automatic exclusion of an identification); United States v. Everett, Case No. 1:17-CR-020-RWS-JKL, 2019 WL 6458425, at *3 (N.D. Ga. July 5, 2019) (failure to follow shuffling procedure in OCGA § 17-20-2 did not render photo-lineup procedure unduly suggestive)....
Copy

Mitchell v. State, 911 S.E.2d 607 (Ga. 2025).

Cited 4 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 28, 2025 | 320 Ga. 673

...and Greene testified that he was looking at “[t]he whole situation” 6 Mitchell also notes the procedure used by Sergeant Burdette — giving the photos to Greene and then leaving him alone in a room to look at them — did not comply with OCGA § 17-20-2, but he concedes the failure to follow the statutory procedures does not require exclusion. See OCGA §§ 17-20-2 (b); 17- 20-3 (“The court may consider the failure to comply with the requirements of [OCGA § 17-20-2] with respect to any challenge to an identification; provided, however, that such failure shall not mandate the exclusion of identification evidence.”)....
Copy

Feder v. State, 901 S.E.2d 561 (Ga. 2024).

Cited 3 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | May 14, 2024 | 319 Ga. 66