Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-6-90 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 6. Bonds and Recognizances, 17-6-1 through 17-6-114.

ARTICLE 4 BONDS FOR GOOD BEHAVIOR AND TO KEEP THE PEACE

17-6-90. Issuance of notice to appear for show cause hearing; requirement of bond; hearing; payment of court costs by affiant; issuance of order of arrest.

  1. Any judicial officer authorized to hold a court of inquiry may, upon the application of others under oath or upon his or her own motion, issue a notice to appear for a show cause hearing to any person whose conduct in the county is sufficient to justify the belief that the safety of any one or more persons in the county or the peace or property of the same is in danger of being injured or disturbed thereby. Such show cause hearing shall be held within seven days of such application or motion. Upon sufficient cause being shown, the court may require from the person a bond with sureties for such person's good behavior with reasonable conditions to ensure the safety of persons or property in the county or the preservation of the peace of the county for a period of up to six months.
  2. All bonds posted under this Code section shall be returnable in the court which required the bond and shall be amendable in the court's discretion.
  3. If it is determined at a hearing that there was not sufficient cause for a hearing to have been held, the affiant who caused the bond to be imposed shall pay all court costs.
  4. At the time of or at any time after the filing of an application as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section, the judicial officer may, in his or her sound discretion, issue an order of arrest for the person or persons named in the application if the sworn allegations regarding the conduct of such person or persons is sufficient to justify the belief that there is imminent danger of injury to any person in the county, damage to any property in the county, or disturbance of the peace of the county. Upon the arrest of such person, a hearing as provided in subsection (a) of this Code section shall be held within 24 hours; otherwise, such person shall be released on bond with sureties and reasonable conditions for his or her good behavior until a hearing can be held.
  5. As used in this Code section, the term "county" means the county in which the judicial officer is authorized to hold a court of inquiry.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 4627; Code 1868, § 4651; Code 1873, § 4749; Code 1882, § 4749; Penal Code 1895, § 1235; Penal Code 1910, § 1317; Code 1933, § 76-101; Ga. L. 1974, p. 322, § 1; Ga. L. 1978, p. 1924, § 1; Ga. L. 1986, p. 1151, § 1; Ga. L. 2007, p. 493, § 1/SB 106; Ga. L. 2013, p. 584, § 3/HB 146.)

The 2013 amendment, effective July 1, 2013, rewrote this Code section.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Former Code 1933, §§ 76-101 and 76-201 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-6-90 and17-6-110) were penal statutes. Rhodes v. Pearce, 189 Ga. 623, 7 S.E.2d 251 (1940); Foster v. Withrow, 201 Ga. 260, 39 S.E.2d 466 (1946).

Strict construction.

- Former Code 1933, §§ 76-101 and 76-201 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-6-90 and17-6-110) were to be strictly construed in favor of the individual against whom the statutes are sought to be applied. Rhodes v. Pearce, 189 Ga. 623, 7 S.E.2d 251 (1940).

Standing to challenge statute.

- Plain language of Georgia's good behavior bond statute, O.C.G.A. § 17-6-90(a), controls two things: (1) the timing and circumstances under which a judicial officer may issue a notice to appear for a show cause hearing; and (2) what action that judicial officer may take following the show cause hearing, including what conditions may be placed on a peace bond. Parker v. Leeuwenburg, 300 Ga. 789, 797 S.E.2d 908 (2017).

In a declaratory judgment action facially challenging Georgia's good behavior bond statute, O.C.G.A. § 17-6-90, the trial court judgment granting summary judgment to appellees was vacated because § 17-6-90(a) did not regulate the appellants' conduct and, in the absence of current peace bonding proceedings or even an allegation that a judicial officer in the county would exercise such discretion, they failed to show nothing more than a hypothetical concern regarding § 17-6-90(a) and, therefore, lacked standing to challenge it. Parker v. Leeuwenburg, 300 Ga. 789, 797 S.E.2d 908 (2017).

Power of superior court judge to issue peace warrant for the arrest and jailing of a person.

- Judge of the superior court did not have power under former Code 1933, § 76-101 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-6-90) to issue a peace warrant for arrest and commitment to jail of a person upon grounds of that section; but the judge has such power under former Code 1933, § 76-201 (see O.C.G.A. § 17-6-110). Rhodes v. Pearce, 189 Ga. 623, 7 S.E.2d 251 (1940).

Jurisdiction of justices of the peace.

- Jurisdiction to issue peace warrants and to hear and determine the cases arising thereunder was expressly conferred upon justices of the peace by former Code 1933, §§ 76-101 and 76-201 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-6-90 and17-6-110). Young v. Fain, 121 Ga. 737, 49 S.E. 731 (1905).

Certiorari does not lie to these proceedings before a justice of the peace. Stephens v. Wallis, 75 Ga. 726 (1885).

Bar to investigation of case behind merits.

- Lawful process issued by a court of competent jurisdiction is a bar to any investigation of the merits of the case behind such process. Young v. Fain, 121 Ga. 737, 49 S.E. 731 (1905).

Magistrate has no authority to insert in the warrant directions to levy on property for costs. Stephens v. Wallis, 75 Ga. 726 (1885).

Cited in Britt v. Whitehall Income Fund, 891 F. Supp. 1578 (M.D. Ga. 1993).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Return to county of issuance.

- Peace warrant proceedings must be returned to the superior court of the county in which the warrant was issued. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U74-7.

Collection of costs in peace warrant proceeding.

- Collection of costs in a peace warrant proceeding which was never returned to the superior court for disposition would be a violation of former Code 1933, §§ 89-9909 and 89-9910 (see O.C.G.A. § 45-11-5) and a misdemeanor. 1974 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U74-7.

Purpose of provision for return to state court.

- Former Code 1933, §§ 76-101 and 76-201 (see O.C.G.A. §§ 17-6-90 and17-6-110) vested jurisdiction for the return of good behavior or peace bonds in the state court in counties in which such a court was established. That change in jurisdiction, not procedure, was the purpose of Ga. L. 1978, p. 1924. 1978 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U78-50.

Probate court jurisdiction.

- Because a probate court may hold a court of inquiry pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 17-7-20, the court may also issue warrants and require bond pursuant to either O.C.G.A. § 17-6-90 or O.C.G.A. § 17-6-110. 1995 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U95-1.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 17-6-90 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

Parker v. Leeuwenburg

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-03-06

Citation: 300 Ga. 789, 797 S.E.2d 908, 2017 WL 875104, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 166

Snippet: This case presents a facial challenge to OCGA § 17-6-90, Georgia’s good behavior bond statute, which permits

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, JQC NOS. 01-44, 01-73, 01-89, 01-90

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-07-02

Citation: 566 S.E.2d 310, 275 Ga. 404, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 1989, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 535

Snippet: to come and take the weapons. [7] See OCGA §§ 17-6-90, et seq. [8] OCGA § 16-9-20(a) defines "Deposit