CopyCited 14 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Oct 19, 2015 | 778 S.E.2d 749
...On March 4, 2013, Warren filed a special plea
of mental incompetence to stand trial. See OCGA §
17-7-130 (b) (2). That
same day, the trial court issued an order for Warren to be evaluated by the
Georgia Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities. See
OCGA §§
17-7-129,
17-7-130 (b) (1)....
Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Feb 17, 2026 | 778 S.E.2d 749
...ript of
that video, Carter alleged that the transcript had been altered.
2. Carter contends that the trial court erred by failing to
conduct an adequate hearing on the issue of Carter’s mental
competence to stand trial pursuant to OCGA §§
17-7-129(a) (2011),
17-7-130(b)(1)(d) (2017), and
17-7-130(d) (2017).2 Without the filing
2 We also note that Carter makes no constitutional claims regarding the
necessity for a hearing.
7
of a special plea of mental incompetency under OCGA § 17-7-
130(b)(2), the applicable versions of those statutes 3 did not require
the trial court to hold a hearing following the competency evaluation
it ordered, and thus, the trial court did not err.
Under OCGA §
17-7-129(a) (2011),
[w]hen information becomes known to the court sufficient
to raise a bona fide doubt regarding the accused’s mental
competency to stand trial, the court has a duty, sua
sponte, to inquire into the accused’s mental competency
to stand trial. The court may order [the Department] to
3 We note that the parties cited different versions of the pertinent Code
provisions in their briefs, as some of the provisions were amended in 2025. But
the Act enacting the changes to OCGA §§
17-7-129 and
17-7-130 included a
provision stating, “This Act shall become effective on July 1, 2025, and shall
apply to any motions made or hearings or trials commenced on or after such
date.” Ga....
...8
conduct an evaluation of the accused’s competency. If the
court determines that it is necessary to have a trial on the
issue of competency, the court shall follow the procedures
set forth in Code Section
17-7-130.
OCGA §
17-7-129(a) (2011)....
...39, 40
(2014) (“[A] statute is to be construed to give sensible and intelligent
effect to all its provisions and to refrain from any interpretation
11
which renders any part of the statute meaningless.”).
First, as to OCGA §
17-7-129(a), the statute did not mandate
such a hearing....
...The statute contemplated that “if the court
determines that it is necessary to have a trial on the issue of
competency, the court shall follow the procedures set forth in” OCGA
§
17-7-130, but the provision itself did not require a hearing or trial
on the issue. See OCGA §
17-7-129(a) (emphasis added)....
...jury trial, if demanded.4 Accordingly, because Carter did not file a
special plea of incompetency under OCGA §
17-7-130(b)(2), the court
was not required to hold a bench trial as to his competence under
OCGA §
17-7-130(d)(1).
Because neither OCGA §§
17-7-129(a) nor
17-7-130(b)(1)
required the court to hold a competency hearing following the
Department’s finding of Carter’s competence, because OCGA § 17-7-
130(d)(1) is best understood as setting a deadline for a bench trial
4...