O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 17-7-172 (2019)

Requirement of announcement by state of readiness for trial prior to announcement by defendant; speedy trial

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

The state shall be required in every case to announce ready or not ready for trial, except in those cases where the defendant is entitled by law to demand a speedy trial, before the defendant shall be called on to make such announcement.

History

Ga. L. 1862-63, p. 138, § 1; Code 1868, § 4613; Code 1873, § 4710; Code 1882, § 4710; Penal Code 1895,

§ 959; Penal Code 1910, § 984; Code 1933, § 27-1902; Ga. L. 2006, p. 893, § 3/HB 1421.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Continuance at defendant’s request. - Since the state was ready to proceed with the defendant’s trial within four months of the offense, but the defendant requested a continuance to prepare the defendant’s case, any delay in trial was caused by the defendant’s own ac-

tions, and the defendant was not denied a speedy trial. Myron v. State, 248 Ga. 120, 281 S.E.2d 600 (1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1154, 102 S. Ct. 1025, 71 L. Ed. 2d 310 (1982). Cited in Young v. Ricketts, 242 Ga. 559, 250 S.E.2d 404 (1978); Garner v. State,

159 Ga. App. 244, 282 S.E.2d 909 (1981); Ruffin v. State, 284 Ga. 52, 663 S.E.2d 189 (2008). RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. - 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Criminal Law, §§ 267 et seq., 278 et seq., 284. C.J.S. - 23 C.J.S., Criminal Procedure

and Rights of the Accused, §§ 793 et seq., 823 et seq.

ARTICLE 8 PROCEDURE FOR SECURING ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES AT GRAND JURY OR TRIAL PROCEEDINGS

Cross references. - Compulsory process to obtain witnesses, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. XIV. Subpoenas for attendance of witnesses, § 24-13-20 et

seq. Securing attendance of prisoners, § 24-13-60 et seq. Uniform Act to Secure the Attendance of Witnesses from Without the State, § 24-13-90 et seq.

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Court’s witnesses (other than expert) in state criminal prosecution, 16 A.L.R.4th 352.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 1991–1991 · leading case: Williams v. State, 411 S.E.2d 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991).
Williams v. State, 411 S.E.2d 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1991). · cites it 2× “On appeal he contends that the trial court’s failure to require the prosecutor to declare ready or not ready for trial as directed by OCGA § 17-7-172, operated to deny him due process of law by depriving him of the opportunity to change his plea from not guilty to guilty.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.