Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 17-7-210 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 17-7-210 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 17-7-210

TITLE 17 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE

Section 7. Pretrial Proceedings, 17-7-1 through 17-7-211.

ARTICLE 9 DISCOVERY

17-7-210, 17-7-211.

Reserved. Repealed by Ga. L. 1994, p. 1895, § 1, effective January 1, 1995.

Editor's notes.

- These Code sections were based on Code 1933, §§ 27-1302 and 27-1303, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1388, § 2.

Warning: 'results' key not found in API response

Cases Citing Georgia Code 17-7-210 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 20

Patterson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2009-06-29

Citation: 679 S.E.2d 716, 285 Ga. 597, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 396

Snippet: 61 LE2d 560) (1979). 2. Citing former OCGA § 17-7-210 (e) and contending that the State did not provide

Smith v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1998-02-09

Citation: 269 Ga. 72, 495 S.E.2d 280, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 474, 1998 Ga. LEXIS 97

Snippet: trial. The state failed to comply with O.C.G.A. § 17-7-210 because it did not furnish in writing the relevant

Turpin v. Todd

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-12-05

Citation: 493 S.E.2d 900, 268 Ga. 820, 98 Fulton County D. Rep. 152, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 757

Snippet: claim that the State failed to comply with OCGA § 17-7-210; Todd’s claim that the trial court erred in admitting

Thomas v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-06-09

Citation: 485 S.E.2d 783, 268 Ga. 135, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2026, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 291

Snippet: the State's non-compliance with former OCGA § 17-7-210 was not raised in the trial court and will not

Marshall v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-01-29

Citation: 466 S.E.2d 567, 266 Ga. 304, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 368, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 46

Snippet: to trial, pursuant to his demand under OCGA § 17-7-210(b).[3] The State responded that the oral statement

Mobley v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-03-17

Citation: 265 Ga. 292, 455 S.E.2d 61

Snippet: furnished to the defense as required by OCGA § 17-7-210. The oral statement, however, was not directly

Hittson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-10-31

Citation: 264 Ga. 682, 449 S.E.2d 586, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 3588, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 857

Snippet: less than ten days prior to trial, under OCGA § 17-7-210 (c), the trial court should not have permitted

Gadson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-06-13

Citation: 264 Ga. 280, 444 S.E.2d 305, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 1972, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 453

Snippet: Gadson with transcripts of those statements, OCGA § 17-7-210 (b), and allowed Gadson’s attorney to listen to

Anderson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-06-29

Citation: 418 S.E.2d 1, 262 Ga. 289, 92 Fulton County D. Rep. 1354, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 550

Snippet: provided to Anderson's counsel before trial. OCGA § 17-7-210. The judge then explained to the jury the rule

Brinson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1992-02-20

Citation: 413 S.E.2d 443, 261 Ga. 884, 46 Fulton County D. Rep. 19, 1992 Ga. LEXIS 170

Snippet: failed to comply with the requirements of OCGA § 17-7-210 in that it did not provide him with a copy of

Todd v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-11-27

Citation: 410 S.E.2d 725, 261 Ga. 766, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 982

Snippet: complete to satisfy the requirements of OCGA § 17-7-210. Myers v. State, 196 Ga. App. 104 (2) (395 SE2d

Johnson v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-05-10

Citation: 404 S.E.2d 108, 261 Ga. 236, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 212

Snippet: failed to comply with the requisites of O.C.G.A. § 17-7-210 by giving him an inadequate summary ten days before

Alexander v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-02-28

Citation: 260 Ga. 870, 401 S.E.2d 7

Snippet: state did comply with the requirements of OCGA §§ 17-7-210 and 17-7-211 by producing copies of scientific

Phillips v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-01-10

Citation: 399 S.E.2d 202, 260 Ga. 742

Snippet: while in police custody under OCGA § 17-7-210. OCGA § 17-7-210 provides that at least ten days prior

Broomall v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-05-31

Citation: 391 S.E.2d 918, 260 Ga. 220

Snippet: because the state failed to comply with OCGA § 17-7-210 (a), requiring the prosecution to serve *222 the

Congdon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-05-17

Citation: 391 S.E.2d 402, 260 Ga. 173

Snippet: by him, contrary to the requirements of OCGA § 17-7-210. (b) In White v. State, 253 Ga. 106, 109 (2) (317

Harmon v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1990-03-01

Citation: 388 S.E.2d 689, 259 Ga. 846

Snippet: submitted on briefs on August 25, 1989. [2] OCGA § 17-7-210 (a) provides that a defendant is entitled, upon

Clark v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-11-30

Citation: 259 Ga. 630, 386 S.E.2d 34

Snippet: knife he used. Clark filed a request under OCGA § 17-7-210 for any statements made by him before trial. The

Potts v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-02-23

Citation: 376 S.E.2d 851, 259 Ga. 96, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 84

Snippet: jail, relying on the notice provisions of OCGA § 17-7-210. The trial court sustained the defendant's objection

Shearer v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1989-02-16

Citation: 376 S.E.2d 194, 259 Ga. 51, 1989 Ga. LEXIS 75

Snippet: ten days prior to trial as required by OCGA §§ 17-7-210; 17-7-211. It is clear that these evaluations