O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-2-42 (2019)

Rights of persons and firms

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Persons and firms may make assignments and prefer creditors.

History

Ga. L. 1894, p. 90, § 2; Civil Code 1895,

§ 2699; Civil Code 1910, § 3232; Code 1933, § 28-303.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Even an insolvent debtor may prefer one creditor to another, and to this end the debtor may transfer choses in action as collateral security for preexisting debt, surplus in such case not being

reserved for the debtor’s own benefit. Suttles v. Vickery, 179 Ga. 751, 177 S.E. 714, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 395 (1934). Mere pendency of suit against debtor does not extinguish the debtor’s

right to prefer one creditor over another, and in such case, controlling question is “existence or nonexistence of fraud in the transfer.” Suttles v. Vickery, 179 Ga. 751, 177 S.E. 714, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 395 (1934). Assignment to be made in good faith and not benefit debtor. - Debtor is permitted to prefer one creditor over another and to make assignments to that end, so long as the transfer is made in good faith and does not benefit the debtor. Bank of Cave Spring v. Gold Kist, Inc., 173 Ga. App. 679, 327 S.E.2d 800, 1985 Ga. App. LEXIS 2666 (1985). Effect of assignment prior to service of summons of garnishment. - If

assignment is made before service of summons of garnishment upon drawee, garnishing creditor will be postponed to assignee, and this is so whether or not garnishee was notified of assignment. Suttles v. Vickery, 179 Ga. 751, 177 S.E. 714, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 395 (1934). Sufficient consideration to support equitable and legal assignments to secure preexisting indebtedness. - Suttles v. Vickery, 179 Ga. 751, 177 S.E. 714, 1934 Ga. LEXIS 395 (1934).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 21 Am. Jur. 2d, Creditor’s Bills, §§ 35, 79. C.J.S. 21 C.J.S., Creditor and Debtor, § 3 et seq. ALR. Priority as between different assignees of same chose in action as affected by notice to debtor, 31 A.L.R. 876; 110 A.L.R. 774. Preference in event of debtor’s insolvency in respect of funds designated or set apart by him for payment of specified obligations, 32 A.L.R. 950.

Right of debtor who pays creditor to control application of payments made by latter to his creditor with proceeds of original payment, 41 A.L.R. 1297; 130 A.L.R. 198; 166 A.L.R. 641. Debtor’s return of merchandise to selling creditor for credit as preferential transfer voidable in bankruptcy proceedings, 62 A.L.R.2d 774. Validity of provision in deed or transfer to assignee for benefit of creditors for payment of attorneys’ fees, 79 A.L.R.2d 513.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2022–2022 · leading case: Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022).
Asset Recovery Assocs., LLC v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc. (N.D. Ga. 2022). · cites it 4× “) However, as the Plaintiff 3 The WFM Defendants question whether persons and firms have the same assignment powers as corporations since O.C.G.A. § 18-2-42, unlike O.C.G.A. § 18-2-41, does not include the language “for the benefit of creditors.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.