O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-2-57 (2019)

Proof required in rendering an assignment void

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

When the assignment is attacked as fraudulent or void for any reason, it shall not be necessary to show fraud or collusion or notice thereof in the assignee in order to render the assignment void.

History

Ga. L. 1894, p. 90, § 15; Civil Code

1895, § 2712; Civil Code 1910, § 3245; Code 1933, § 28-316.

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 6 Am. Jur. 2d, Assignments for Benefit of Creditors, § 116. C.J.S. 21 C.J.S., Creditor and Debtor, §§ 69, 78 et seq. 37 C.J.S., Fraudulent Conveyances, § 150 et seq. ALR. The fact that parties to a conveyance in

fraud of creditors are not in pari delicto as affecting the right of the party guilty of fraud to relief, 7 A.L.R. 150. Conveyance in consideration of future support as fraudulent against creditors, 23 A.L.R. 584. Absolute conveyance or transfer with secret reservation as fraudulent per se as against creditors, 68 A.L.R. 306.