O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 18-4-77 (2019)

Attachment for summons of garnishment on a financial institution

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

“IN THE Plaintiff

COURT OF STATE OF GEORGIA ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) v. Defendant Garnishee Civil Action File No.

ATTACHMENT FOR SUMMONS OF GARNISHMENT ON A FINANCIAL INSTITUTION Other known names of the Defendant:

Current and past addresses of the Defendant:

Social security number or federal tax identification number of the Defendant:

Account or identification numbers of accounts of the Defendant used by the Garnishee:

Other allegations pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 18-4-23:

THIS PLEADING SHALL NOT BE FILED WITH THE COURT”

History

Code 1981, § 18-4-77, enacted by Ga. L. 2016, p. 8, § 1/SB 255.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Cited in Blach v. Diaz-Verson, 303 Ga. 63, 810 S.E.2d 129 (2018).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2018–2018 · leading case: Blach v. Diaz-Verson, 810 S.E.2d 129 (Ga. 2018).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Blach v. Diaz-Verson, 810 S.E.2d 129 (Ga. 2018). · cites it 2× “" OCGA § 18-4-77. And the "Financial institution garnishee answer form" contains a box labeled in bold *133 type "Check this box if the Defendant is not presently an account holder of the Garnishee.”
Blach v. Diaz-Verson, 303 Ga. 63 (2018). · cites it 2× “” OCGA § 18-4-77. And the “Financial institution garnishee answer form” contains a box labeled in bold type “Check this box if the Defendant is not presently an account holder of the Garnishee.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.