Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448A proceeding to compel support under this article may be maintained where both the obligee and the obligor are residents of or are domiciled or found in different counties of this state. Whenever a proceeding under this article is so used, what has been written in other parts of this article as "initiating state" shall be read as if written "initiating county" and what has been written as "responding state" shall be read as if written "responding county."
(Ga. L. 1958, p. 34, § 4A.)
- Any order of support issued by a court of this state, entered in an action filed under the Uniform Reciprocal Enforcement of Support Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-11-40 et seq., shall not supersede any previous order of support issued in a divorce or separate maintenance action, and the latter order will not constitute a modification of the former order; thus, amounts for a particular period paid pursuant to either order shall be credited against amounts accruing or accrued for the same period under both. Ray v. Ray, 247 Ga. 467, 277 S.E.2d 495 (1981); Bisno v. Biloon, 161 Ga. App. 351, 291 S.E.2d 66 (1982), overruled on other grounds, State ex rel. McKenna v. McKenna, 253 Ga. 6, 315 S.E.2d 885 (1984).
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1984-05-22
Citation: 315 S.E.2d 885, 253 Ga. 6
Snippet: same manner as a state to state action. OCGA § 19-11-47. In Ray, the DeKalb County divorce decree provided