O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-12-2 (2019)

Hearing on objections to petition

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

If written objections are filed by any interested or affected party within the time limits specified in subsection (h) of Code Section 19-12-1, the court shall proceed to hear the matter at chambers.

History

Ga. L. 1875, p. 103, § 2; Code 1882, § 1787b; Civil Code 1895, § 2496; Civil

Code 1910, § 3015; Code 1933, § 79-502; Ga. L. 1961, p. 129, § 2; Ga. L. 1973, p. 504, § 2; Ga. L. 2017, p. 571, § 2/HB 279.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Written objections improperly ignored. - In addition to the lack of personal service, the judgment in the case was infirm because of the trial court’s failure to consider the prisoner-father’s

written objections to the petition, contrary to the requirement of O.C.G.A. § 19-12-2. Brown v. Waters, 208 Ga. App. 866, 432 S.E.2d 817, 1993 Ga. App. LEXIS 748 (1993).

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 65 C.J.S., Names, § 21 et seq.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 3 cases, 1993–2009 · leading case: In Re Serpentfoot, 646 S.E.2d 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
In Re Serpentfoot, 646 S.E.2d 267 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “Appellant directed her notice of appeal to the Supreme Court, challenging the constitutionality of *326 OCGA § 19-12-2, 1 but that Court transferred the case to this Court because appellant had not obtained a ruling by the trial court on any constitutional issue.”
Brown v. Waters, 432 S.E.2d 817 (Ga. Ct. App. 1993). · cites it 4× “[OCGA § 19-12-2].” Doe v. Roe, 235 Ga. 318, 319 ( 219 SE2d 700 ) (1975).”
In Re Candelaria, 684 S.E.2d 421 (Ga. Ct. App. 2009). · cites it 2× “2 See OCGA § 19-12-2; In re Serpentfoot, 285 Ga.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.