O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-13-6 (2019)

Penalties

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)

Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.

Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

A violation of an order issued pursuant to this article may be punished by an action for contempt or criminally punished as provided in Article 7 of Chapter 5 of Title 16.

History

Code 1981, § 19-13-6, enacted by Ga. L.

1985, p. 905, § 1; Ga. L. 1988, p. 1249, § 1; Ga. L. 2003, p. 652, § 3.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Double jeopardy. - State may not prosecute a defendant for aggravated stalking based upon the same set of facts previously used to prosecute the same defendant for a violation of a domestic

violence order. Kinney v. State, 223 Ga. App. 418, 477 S.E.2d 843, 1996 Ga. App. LEXIS 1118 (1996), cert. denied, No. S97C0323, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 205 (Ga. Feb. 21, 1997).

RESEARCH REFERENCES C.J.S. 28 C.J.S., Domestic Abuse and Violence, § 37 et seq.

ARTICLE 1A FAMILY VIOLENCE INTERVENTION Cross references. Family violence, T. 19, C. 13. Communications between victim of

family violence or sexual assault and agents providing service to such victim, §

Family violence intervention program participation as condition of probation, § 42-8-35.6. Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2002, p. 1435, § 1, not codified by

the General Assembly, provides that: “This Act shall be known and may be cited as the ‘Georgia’s Family Violence Intervention Program Certification Act.’”

Notes of Decisions

Cited in 2 cases, 1996–2004 · leading case: Kinney v. State, 477 S.E.2d 843 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996).

Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment

Kinney v. State, 477 S.E.2d 843 (Ga. Ct. App. 1996). · cites it 8× “” To that end, an accusation was drawn in the State Court of Clayton County on September 23, 1994, alleging that the appellant “did violate a temporary protective order issued by a superior court judge.”

Fisher v. State, 599 S.E.2d 361 (Ga. Ct. App. 2004). · cites it 2× “” Former OCGA § 19-13-6 (b). “[A]ny person who drives a motor vehicle on any public highway of this state at a time when his privilege to do so is suspended.”

Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.