O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-3-37 (2019)

[Reserved] Parental consent to marriage of underage applicants; when necessary; how obtained

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

History

Ga. L. 1924, p. 53, § 2; Ga. L. 1927, p. 224, § 1; Code 1933, § 53-204; Ga. L. 1965, p. 335, § 4; Ga. L. 1967, p. 31, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 382, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 193, § 5; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1719, § 3; Ga. L. 2006, p. 141, § 6C/HB 847; Ga. L. 2016, p.

134, § 3-1/HB 887; repealed by Ga. L. 2019, p. 558, § 1-4/HB 228, effective July 1, 2019.

Annotations

Editor's notes. - This Code section was based on Orig. Code 1863, § 1661; Code 1868, § 1704; Code 1873, § 1705; Code 1882, § 1705; Civil Code 1895, § 2419; Civil Code 1910, § 2938; Ga. L. 1924, p. 53, § 2; Ga. L. 1927, p. 224, § 1; Code 1933, § 53-204; Ga. L. 1965, p. 335, § 4; Ga. L. 1967, p. 31, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 382, § 1; Ga. L. 1972, p. 193, § 5; Ga. L. 1976, p. 1719, § 3; Ga. L. 2006, p. 141, § 6C/HB 847; Ga. L. 2016, p. 134, § 3-1/HB 887.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1988–2003 · leading case: Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988).
Thompson v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 815 (1988). · cites it 2× “Ga. Code Ann. § 19-3-37 (1982) Haw. Haw. Rev.”
Kirkpatrick v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Clark, 64 P.3d 1056 (Nev. 2003). · cites it 2× “, Ga. Code Ann. § 19-3-37 (b) (1999); Iowa Code § 595.”
19-3-37(b): 1 case
Kirkpatrick v. Eighth Jud. Dist. Court Ex Rel. Cnty. of Clark, 64 P.3d 1056 (Nev. 2003). “, Ga. Code Ann. § 19-3-37 (b) (1999); Iowa Code § 595.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.