O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-4-2 (2019)

Right to file for annulment or divorce

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Parties who enter into a marriage which is declared void by law shall have the right to file: (1) A petition for annulment; or (2) A petition for divorce, if grounds for divorce exist.

History

Ga. L. 1952, p. 149, § 2.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Purpose of section. - Purpose of Ga. L. 1952, p. 149, §§ 1 and 2 (see now O.C.G.A. § 19-4-1 and 19-4-2), to uphold the interest and welfare of children, is manifested in the provisions insuring their legitimacy, prohibiting annulment, and thus requiring divorce to dissolve such marriages. Riddle v. Riddle, 240 Ga. 515, 241 S.E.2d 214, 1978 Ga. LEXIS 788 (1978). Setting aside divorce decree when marriage void from inception. - Trial

court erred by denying an ex-husband’s motion to set aside a divorce decree with the ex-wife because the marriage was void from the marriage’s inception due to the ex-wife having a living spouse from an undissolved marriage at the time and there was no issue of the protection of a child to prevent the decree from being set aside. Wright v. Hall, 292 Ga. 457, 738 S.E.2d 594, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 153 (2013).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 4 Am. Jur. 2d, Annulment of Marriage, § 59.

C.J.S. 55 C.J.S., Marriage, § 56.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2013–2013 · leading case: Wright v. Hall, 738 S.E.2d 594 (Ga. 2013).
Wright v. Hall, 738 S.E.2d 594 (Ga. 2013). · cites it 2× “at 513 ; see OCGA § 19-4-2. In Wallace , we explained: Historically in this State, the availability of divorce presupposes the existence of a valid marriage.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.