Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 19-6-22 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 19-6-22 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 19-6-22

TITLE 19 DOMESTIC RELATIONS

Section 6. Alimony and Child Support, 19-6-1 through 19-6-53.

ARTICLE 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS

19-6-22. Revision of judgment for permanent alimony - Expenses of litigation.

Where a petition authorized by subsection (a) of Code Section 19-6-19 is filed by a party obligated to pay alimony, the court may require the party to pay the reasonable expenses of litigation as may be incurred by the party's former spouse on behalf of the former spouse in defense thereof.

(Ga. L. 1955, p. 630, § 4; Ga. L. 1979, p. 466, § 26; Ga. L. 2005, p. 224, § 9/HB 221; Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 8/SB 382.)

Editor's notes.

- Ga. L. 2005, p. 224, § 1/HB 221, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that: "The General Assembly finds and declares that it is important to assess periodically child support guidelines and determine whether existing guidelines continue to be viable and effective or whether they have failed or ceased to accomplish their original policy objectives. The General Assembly further finds that supporting Georgia's children is vitally important to the citizens of Georgia. Therefore, the General Assembly has determined that it is in the best interests of the state and its citizenry to undertake an evaluation of the child support guidelines on a continuing basis. The General Assembly declares that it is important that all of Georgia's children are provided with adequate financial support whether the children's parents are living together or not living together. The General Assembly finds that both parents have a continuing obligation with respect to providing financial and emotional stability for their child or children. It is the hope of the members of the General Assembly that all parents work together to advance the best interest of their children."

Ga. L. 2006, p. 583, § 10(b)/SB 382, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "Sections 1 through 7 of this Act shall become effective on January 1, 2007, and shall apply to all pending civil actions on or after January 1, 2007."

Law reviews.

- For article discussing Georgia alimony provisions allowing modification of judgments with respect to federal and state constitutional limitations, see 18 Ga. B.J. 153 (1955). For article surveying developments in Georgia domestic relations law from mid-1980 through mid-1981, see 33 Mercer L. Rev. 109 (1981). For survey article on domestic relations, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 113 (1982). For article on 2005 amendment of this Code section, see 22 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 73 (2005).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Counterclaim is petition for purposes of Ga. L. 1979, p. 466, § 26 and will support a trial court's award of reasonable compensation for those attorney fees incurred solely in defense of the liable former spouse's counterclaim. Wright v. Wright, 246 Ga. 81, 268 S.E.2d 666 (1980).

Award of reasonable attorney fees to spouse contesting modification.

- Spouse contesting modification sought by one obligated to pay may be awarded reasonable attorney fees during the pendency of the litigation, including an interlocutory award. Hilsman v. Hilsman, 245 Ga. 555, 266 S.E.2d 173 (1980).

Discretion of court.

- Trial court's discretion in making an award under O.C.G.A. § 19-6-22 is not limited to a consideration of the financial circumstances of the party opposing modification. Shapiro v. Lipman, 259 Ga. 85, 377 S.E.2d 673 (1989).

Trial court may grant attorney fees if such fees are determined necessary to insure a proper defense, and upon consideration of the present financial circumstances of the parties. Hilsman v. Hilsman, 245 Ga. 555, 266 S.E.2d 173 (1980).

While an award of attorney fees in a modification action is not mandatory or a condition precedent to bringing an application, the trial judge may in the exercise of judicial discretion, award attorney's fees and expenses of litigation incurred during the pendency of the proceedings. Hilsman v. Hilsman, 245 Ga. 555, 266 S.E.2d 173 (1980).

Attorney fees in action for change of custody.

- O.C.G.A. § 19-6-22 does not authorize an award of attorney fees for an action for a change of custody. Haselden v. Haselden, 255 Ga. 366, 338 S.E.2d 257 (1986); Owen v. Owen, 183 Ga. App. 472, 359 S.E.2d 229 (1987).

Cited in Oliver v. Oliver, 244 Ga. 20, 257 S.E.2d 527 (1979); Kaufmann v. Kaufmann, 245 Ga. 721, 267 S.E.2d 16 (1980); Wehner v. Parris, 258 Ga. App. 772, 574 S.E.2d 921 (2002).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Right of former wife to counsel fees upon application after absolute divorce to increase or decrease alimony, 15 A.L.R.2d 1252.

Right to attorneys' fees in proceeding, after absolute divorce, for modification of child custody or support order, 57 A.L.R.4th 710.

Cases Citing O.C.G.A. § 19-6-22

Total Results: 3  |  Sort by: Relevance  |  Newest First

Copy

Shapiro v. Lipman, 377 S.E.2d 673 (Ga. 1989).

Cited 55 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Mar 15, 1989 | 259 Ga. 85

...Accordingly, the trial court was not authorized to award the wife attorney fees under OCGA § 19-6-19 (d). Nonetheless, this holding does not require reversal of the trial court's award of attorney fees to the wife because the trial court would have been authorized, in its discretion, to award her fees under OCGA § 19-6-22 which provides: Where a [petition to modify alimony] is filed by a party obligated to pay alimony, the court may require the party to pay the reasonable expenses of litigation as may be incurred by the party's former spouse, either on behalf of the former spouse, or the child or children, or both, in defense thereof. Hilsman v. Hilsman, 245 Ga. 555, 556 (2) (266 SE2d 173) (1980). Contrary to the husband's argument, the trial court's discretion in making an award under OCGA § 19-6-22 is not limited to a consideration of the financial circumstances of the party opposing modification. Both OCGA § 19-6-19 (d) and § 19-6-22 authorize but do not require the trial court to award attorney fees — to the prevailing party under OCGA § 19-6-19 (d) and to the defending party under OCGA § 19-6-22. Since the trial court awarded the wife attorney fees, erroneously determining her to be the prevailing party under OCGA § 19-6-19 (d), it is apparent it exercised its discretion in making that award and would have done so under OCGA § 19-6-22....
Copy

Jones v. Jones, 632 S.E.2d 121 (Ga. 2006).

Cited 40 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jul 6, 2006 | 280 Ga. 712, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2186

...ren granted in connection with" the final divorce decree); OCGA § 19-6-18(a) (authorizing revision of certain judgments providing for "permanent alimony for the support of a wife or child or children, or both, rendered prior to July 1, 1977"); OCGA § 19-6-22 (authorizing party obligated to pay alimony to pay attorney fees in modification action incurred by former spouse "either on behalf of the former spouse, or the child or children, or both, in defense thereof"); OCGA § 19-6-27(a) (after gr...
Copy

Haselden v. Haselden, 338 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 1986).

Cited 7 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Jan 7, 1986 | 255 Ga. 366

...erdict and judgment increasing the child-support payments. The plaintiff-father appeals from the judgment for the defendant-mother, and the appellee cross-appeals from the denial of attorney fees. 1. It was not error to deny attorney fees under OCGA § 19-6-22, which does not authorize an award of attorney fees for an action for a change of custody....