O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 19-9-1.2 (2019)

Required domestic relations case filing information form

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Pursuant to Code Section 9-11-3, and in addition to the filing requirements contained in Code Section 19-6-15, in all proceedings under this article the plaintiff shall file a domestic relations case filing information form as prescribed by the Judicial Council of Georgia.

History

Code 1981, § 19-9-1.2, enacted by Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 5/HB 369; Ga. L. 2017, p. 632, § 2-9/SB 132.

Annotations

Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 1/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: “The General Assembly of Georgia declares that it is the policy of this state to assure that minor children have frequent and continuing contact with parents who have shown the ability to act in the best

interests of their children and to encourage parents to share in the rights and responsibilities of rearing their children after the parents have separated or dissolved their marriage or relationship.” Ga. L. 2007, p. 554, § 8/HB 369, not codified by the General Assembly, provides that this Code section shall apply to all child custody proceedings and modifications of child custody filed on or after January 1, 2008.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case, 2012–2012 · leading case: Andersen v. Farrington, 731 S.E.2d 351 (Ga. 2012).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Andersen v. Farrington, 731 S.E.2d 351 (Ga. 2012). · cites it 2× “Even if it can be said that the trial court erred by proceeding without the filing of a domestic relations case information form, see OCGA §§ 19-9-1.2, 19-9-3 (h), the error was harmless.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.