Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448If a question of existence or exercise of jurisdiction under this article is raised in a child custody proceeding, the question, upon request of a party, must be given priority on the calendar and handled expeditiously.
(Code 1981, §19-9-46, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 129, § 1.)
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, former Code 1933, §§ 74-501 through 74-525, subsequently codified as §§ 19-9-40 through19-9-64, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Because the parties' Texas divorce action had been abated due to an earlier Mexican divorce, there was no action pending in Texas; therefore, the trial court did not have to inquire into the court's jurisdiction under the former Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, O.C.G.A. § 19-9-40 et seq. Baca v. Baca, 256 Ga. App. 514, 568 S.E.2d 746 (2002) (decided under former Code Section19-9-40 et seq.)
Warning: 'results' key not found in API response
No results found for Georgia Code 19-9-46.