Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §19-9-70, enacted by Ga. L. 2001, p. 129, § 1.)
- For article, "Domestic Relations Law," see 53 Mercer L. Rev. 265 (2001).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction Act, former Code 1933, §§ 74-501 through 74-525, subsequently codified as §§ 19-9-40 through19-9-64, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- Foreign custody decrees are enforceable merely by filing a certified copy with the clerk of superior court. Roehl v. O'Keefe, 243 Ga. 696, 256 S.E.2d 375 (1979) (decided under former Code Section19-9-55).
- Trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction of a Florida decree that had not been domesticated. Kempton v. Richards, 233 Ga. App. 238, 503 S.E.2d 876 (1998) (decided under former Code Section19-9-55).
Without an original signature or court seal, a foreign divorce decree did not meet the statutory requirements for proper domestication. Henderson v. Justice, 223 Ga. App. 591, 478 S.E.2d 434 (1996) (decided under former Code Section19-9-55).
- Trial court did not domesticate Texas divorce decree and was therefore not authorized to modify child support and visitation provisions of that decree. McGowan v. McGowan, 231 Ga. App. 362, 498 S.E.2d 574 (1998) (decided under former Code Section19-9-55).
Act of simply appending a divorce and custody decree as an exhibit to a petition for modification of custody did not constitute a proper filing of the decree for purposes of the decree's domestication. Wylie v. Blatchley, 237 Ga. App. 563, 515 S.E.2d 855 (1999) (decided under former Code Section19-9-55).
- 50 C.J.S., Judgments, §§ 1259 et seq., 1274.
No results found for Georgia Code 19-9-70.