Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 2-12-6 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 2-12-6 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 2-12-6

TITLE 2 AGRICULTURE

Section 12. Fertilizers, Liming Materials, and Soil Amendments, 2-12-1 through 2-12-110.

ARTICLE 1 FERTILIZERS

2-12-6. Labeling of fertilizer.

  1. Any fertilizer distributed in this state in containers shall have placed on or affixed to the container a label setting forth in clearly legible and conspicuous form the following information:
    1. Net weight;
    2. Brand and grade, provided that the grade shall not be required when no primary plant nutrients are claimed;
    3. Guaranteed analysis;
    4. Name and address of the licensee, provided that when the product is not actually manufactured by the licensee, the name of the licensee on the label may be further qualified by either of the following statements:
      1. Made for (name of licensee); or
      2. Distributed by (name of licensee);
    5. Sources from which all plant nutrients are derived, if added, guaranteed, claimed, or advertised; and
    6. Any other information as prescribed by regulation.
  2. In the case of bulk shipments, the information, as specified in paragraphs (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this Code section in written or printed form shall accompany delivery and be supplied to the purchaser at time of delivery.
  3. Custom-mixed specialty fertilizer shall be labeled as specified in paragraphs (1) through (5) of subsection (a) of this Code section.

(Code 1981, §2-12-6, enacted by Ga. L. 1997, p. 1271, § 1.)

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, annotations decided under former Code 1910, §§ 1173 and 1783 and former Ga. L. 1929, pp. 228-232 are included in the annotations for this Code section.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Contents of certified copy of analysis in misbranding action.

- A certified copy of an analysis of fertilizers to be used in an action for false and incorrect branding should not contain a statement as to the penalty or damage for which the manufacturer or dealer might be deemed to be liable; only the mathematical result of the chemical analysis should be stated. Georgia Fertilizer Co. v. Walker, 45 Ga. App. 68, 163 S.E. 277 (1932) (decided under former Code 1910, §§ 1173, 1783).

Inspection of subsample not required.

- This section does not require each subsample of each lot of fertilizer or fertilizer material inspected to be separately analyzed. Blackshear Mfg. Co. v. Talmadge, 173 Ga. 703, 161 S.E. 256 (1931) (decided under former Ga. L. 1929, pp. 228-232).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

C.J.S.

- 3 C.J.S., Agriculture, § 76.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 2-12-6 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 11

Peterson v. Vie

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-12-10

Snippet: days allowed by statute. See OCGA §§ 5-6- 35 (d); 21-2-6 (e). Accordingly, the delay in consideration and

CATOOSA COUNTY REPUBLICAN PARTY v. HENRY

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-09-17

Snippet: superintendent’s decision on such a challenge. See OCGA § 21-2-6 (b), (e). This action is not an election contest

SCOTT K. CAMP v. RYAN CHRISTOPHER WILLIAMS

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-09-30

Snippet: through which the challenge was asserted — OCGA § 21-2-6 — covers only

Lilly v. Heard

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-30

Snippet: pre-election challenge to her candidacy, see OCGA § 21-2-6, contending that she was ineligible to run for

Lilly v. Heard

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-06-30

Citation: 295 Ga. 399, 761 S.E.2d 46, 2014 WL 2924952, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 536

Snippet: pre-election challenge to her candidacy, see OCGA § 21-2-6, contending that she was ineligible to run for

Burgess v. Liberty County Board of Elections

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-29

Citation: 291 Ga. 802, 733 S.E.2d 774, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3326, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 843

Snippet: Pursuant to the election contest provisions of OCGA § 21-2-6 (b), several eligible fourth district voters filed

Cook v. BD. OF REGISTRARS OF RANDOLPH CTY.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-05-07

Citation: 727 S.E.2d 478, 291 Ga. 67, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1578, 2012 WL 1571610, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 449

Snippet: OCGA § 21-2-5, and Code Ann. § 34-406, now OCGA § 21-2-6, expressly authorizing such pre-election challenges

Allen v. Yost

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2006-10-16

Citation: 636 S.E.2d 517, 281 Ga. 102, 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 3174, 2006 Ga. LEXIS 836

Snippet: election, or to exercise his right under OCGA § 21-2-6(e) to seek a stay of the election, we held that

In Re Inquiry Concerning Judge Robertson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-04-19

Citation: 596 S.E.2d 2, 277 Ga. 831, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 1400, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 314

Snippet: Constitution (eligibility for public office); OCGA §§ 21-2-6 and 21-2-8 (candidate eligibility and qualifications)

Jordan v. Cook

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2003-10-06

Citation: 587 S.E.2d 52, 277 Ga. 155, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 2971, 2003 Ga. LEXIS 835

Snippet: seek a stay of the election pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-6(e) (reviewing court may order a stay in a challenge

In Re Motion of Atlanta Journal-Constitution

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-09-13

Citation: 519 S.E.2d 909, 271 Ga. 436, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 3401, 27 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2309, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 669

Snippet: 369 S.E.2d 755 (1988). [4] USCR 21.1. [5] USCR 21.2. [6] USCR 21. [7] Long, 258 Ga. at 413, 369 S.E