Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 2-22-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 2-22-2 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 2-22-2

TITLE 2 AGRICULTURE

Section 22. Poultry Contract Growers or Producers, 2-22-1 through 2-22-5.

ARTICLE 7 PICK-YOUR-OWN FARM OPERATIONS

2-22-2. Voidability of contracts by contract growers or producers; right and notice of cancellation.

  1. Any production contract entered into, extended, renewed, or amended on or after July 1, 2004, shall be voidable by the contract grower or contract producer if:
    1. The contract grower or contract producer has not been afforded the opportunity to have the proposed production contract reviewed outside the business premises of the integrator or processor or its agents by an attorney or adviser of the contract grower's or contract producer's choosing for at least three business days prior to execution; provided, however, that this paragraph shall not apply to the mere extension or renewal of an existing contract with no change in material terms from the existing contract other than the period covered thereby;
    2. The contract does not quote the provisions of subsection (b) of this Code section; or
    3. The contract is not signed by all parties before chicks are placed with the contract grower or contract producer.
    1. Unless waived in writing by the contract grower or contract producer at the time of signing a production contract, the contract grower or contract producer shall have a right to cancel a production contract until 12:00 Midnight of the third business day after the day on which he or she signs the contract or until chicks have been placed with the contract grower or contract producer, whichever occurs first.
    2. Notice of cancellation under this subsection shall be given in writing to the integrator or processor at the place of business as set forth in the production contract by certified mail or statutory overnight delivery, return receipt requested, which shall be posted before termination of the right to cancel under paragraph (1) of this subsection. Notice of such written cancellation need not include any particular words or phrases to be effective so long as it indicates the intention of the contract grower or contract producer not to be bound by the production contract.

(Code 1981, §2-22-2, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 688, § 1.)

Code Commission notes.

- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2004, "July 1, 2004," was substituted for "the effective date of this chapter" in subsection (a).

Cases Citing Georgia Code 2-22-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 8

In THE INTEREST OF C.C., Children

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-08-23

Snippet: dependent within the meaning of OCGA § 15-11-2 (22), 2 and that it was contrary to the welfare of the

Langston v. Allen

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1997-11-24

Citation: 493 S.E.2d 401, 268 Ga. 733, 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 4244, 1997 Ga. LEXIS 745

Snippet: defraud her creditors in violation of OCGA § 18-2-22(2), the trial court did not err by denying appellants'

Dearing v. A. R. III, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-01-29

Citation: 466 S.E.2d 565, 266 Ga. 301, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 435, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 44

Snippet: intention was known to Mrs. Dearing. OCGA § 18-2-22(2). Second, Mr. Dearing was insolvent when he made

Smith v. Travis Pruitt & Associates, P.C.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-04-10

Citation: 265 Ga. 347, 455 S.E.2d 586

Snippet: trial, the trial court, pursuant to OCGA § 18-2-22 (2) and (3), declared a conveyance of residential

Merrell v. Beckwith

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1994-02-07

Citation: 439 S.E.2d 488, 263 Ga. 779, 94 Fulton County D. Rep. 478, 1994 Ga. LEXIS 67

Snippet: that the conveyance was fraudulent under § 18-2-22. 2. Merrell takes issue with the court's refusal to

Hall v. Hidy

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1993-10-12

Citation: 263 Ga. 422, 435 S.E.2d 215, 93 Fulton County D. Rep. 3630, 1993 Ga. LEXIS 699

Snippet: defraud creditors] shall be valid.” OCGA § 18-2-22 (2). Where there is a subsequent transaction, “[a]

Dime Savings Bank of New York, FSB v. Sandy Springs Associates, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1991-07-03

Citation: 405 S.E.2d 491, 261 Ga. 485, 1991 Ga. LEXIS 334

Snippet: has no notice. See OCGA §§ 23-1-19, 23-1-20, 18-2-22(2). The record does not indicate that either the

State v. Military Circle Pet Center No. 94, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1987-09-10

Citation: 360 S.E.2d 248, 257 Ga. 388, 1987 Ga. LEXIS 896

Snippet: not allege any of the provisions of OCGA § 16-2-22 (2). We agree with the state that it was not required