O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (2019)

Brief period of quiet reflection authorized; nature of period

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

(a) In each public school classroom, the teacher in charge shall, at the opening of school upon every school day, conduct a brief period of quiet reflection for not more than 60 seconds with the participation of all the pupils therein assembled. (b) The moment of quiet reflection authorized by subsection (a) of this Code section is not intended to be and shall not be conducted as a religious service or exercise but shall be considered as an opportunity for a moment of silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day. (c) The provisions of subsections (a) and (b) of this Code section shall not prevent student initiated voluntary school prayers at schools or school related events which are nonsectarian and nonproselytizing in nature.

History

Ga. L. 1969, p. 488, § 1; Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, §§ 2, 3.

Annotations

Cross references. Freedom of conscience, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. III. Religious opinions and freedom of religion, Ga. Const. 1983, Art. I, Sec. I, Para. IV. Editor’s notes. Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, § 1, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: “The General Assembly finds that in today’s hectic society, all too few of our citizens are able to experience even a moment of

quiet reflection before plunging headlong into the day’s activities. Our young citizens are particularly affected by this absence of an opportunity for a moment of quiet reflection. The General Assembly finds that our young, and society as a whole, would be well served if students were afforded a moment of quiet reflection at the beginning of each day in the public schools.” Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, § 4, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: “If any portion of this bill is found to be unconstitutional, it shall be stricken and the remaining portions of this bill shall remain

in full force and effect as if the stricken portion had not been enacted.” Law reviews. For note on the 1994 amendment of this

Code section, see 11 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 187 (1994).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Section held constitutional. - O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050, as amended by the Moment of Quiet Reflection Act, Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, is constitutional in the statute’s entirety, both facially and as applied, and did not violate the establishment clause of the First Amendment to the United States Constitution when the school principal announced over the intercom the quiet moment. Bown v. Gwinnett County Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10766 (N.D. Ga. 1995), aff’d, 112 F.3d 1464, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10001 (11th Cir. 1997). Georgia Moment of Quiet Reflection in Schools Act, Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, does not violate the establishment clause because the Act satisfies all three prongs of the Lemon test. The Act does not have the

primary effect of advancing or inhibiting religion and does not create an excessive government entanglement with religion. Bown v. Gwinnett County Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10001 (11th Cir. 1997). Standing. - Plaintiff’s status as a teacher, plaintiff’s objection to implementing the moment of silence in plaintiff’s classroom, and plaintiff’s subsequent suspension and termination were sufficient to afford plaintiff standing to challenge the Moment of Quiet Reflection in Schools Act, Ga. L. 1994, p. 256, which amended O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050. Bown v. Gwinnett County Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10766 (N.D. Ga. 1995), aff’d, 112 F.3d 1464, 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 10001 (11th Cir. 1997).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 68 Am. Jur. 2d, Schools, § 436 et seq. ALR. Constitutionality of regulation or policy governing prayer, meditation, or “moment of silence” in public schools, 110 A.L.R. Fed. 211.

Validity and construction of public school regulation of student distribution of religious documents at school, 136 A.L.R. Fed 551.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 9 cases, 1985–2010 · leading case: Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010).
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010). · cites it 10× “§ 20-2-1050(b) (period "shall be considered as an opportunity for a moment of silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day") with 105 ILCS 20/1 (period "shall be an opportunity for silent prayer or for silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day")…”
Wallace v. Jaffree, 472 U.S. 38 (1985). · cites it 4× “1 (1980); Ga. Code Ann. § 20-2-1050 (1982); Ill. Rev.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464 (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 6× “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act’s enforcement be enjoined.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564 (N.D. Ga. 1995). · cites it 25× “Laws 256 (1994) (codified at O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (Supp.1995)). Plaintiff Brian Gillespie Bown (“Bown”), a school teacher at South Gwinnett High School, filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the Act is unconstitutional in its entirety and requesting…”
Chandler v. James, 958 F. Supp. 1550 (M.D. Ala. 1997). “See Ga.Code Ann. § 20-2-1050(a). In the instant case, § 16-1-20.”
Croft v. Governor of Texas, 530 F. Supp. 2d 825 (N.D. Tex. 2008). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050. The statute’s un-codified preamble stated: The General Assembly finds that in today’s hectic society, all too few of our citizens are able to experience even a moment of quiet reflection before plunging headlong into the day’s activities.”
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Gilmore, 258 F.3d 265 (4th Cir. 2001). · cites it 2× “(quoting Ga. Code Ann. § 20-2-1050 (b) (Michie 1996)).”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cty. Sch. Dist. (11th Cir. 1997). · cites it 6× “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act's enforcement be enjoined.”
Chandler v. James, 958 F. Supp. 1550 (M.D. Ala. 1997). “See Ga.Code Ann. § 20-2-1050(a). In the instant case, § 16-1-20.”
— 20-2-1050(a) — 6 cases
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010). “§ 20-2-1050(b) (period "shall be considered as an opportunity for a moment of silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day") with 105 ILCS 20/1 (period "shall be an opportunity for silent prayer or for silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day")…”
Chandler v. James, 958 F. Supp. 1550 (M.D. Ala. 1997). “See Ga.Code Ann. § 20-2-1050(a). In the instant case, § 16-1-20.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464 (11th Cir. 1997). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act’s enforcement be enjoined.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “Laws 256 (1994) (codified at O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (Supp.1995)). Plaintiff Brian Gillespie Bown (“Bown”), a school teacher at South Gwinnett High School, filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the Act is unconstitutional in its entirety and requesting…”
Chandler v. James, 958 F. Supp. 1550 (M.D. Ala. 1997). “See Ga.Code Ann. § 20-2-1050(a). In the instant case, § 16-1-20.”
— 20-2-1050(b) — 5 cases
Sherman Ex Rel. Sherman v. Koch, 623 F.3d 501 (7th Cir. 2010). “§ 20-2-1050(b) (period "shall be considered as an opportunity for a moment of silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day") with 105 ILCS 20/1 (period "shall be an opportunity for silent prayer or for silent reflection on the anticipated activities of the day")…”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464 (11th Cir. 1997). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act’s enforcement be enjoined.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “Laws 256 (1994) (codified at O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (Supp.1995)). Plaintiff Brian Gillespie Bown (“Bown”), a school teacher at South Gwinnett High School, filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the Act is unconstitutional in its entirety and requesting…”
Brown Ex Rel. Brown v. Gilmore, 258 F.3d 265 (4th Cir. 2001). “(quoting Ga. Code Ann. § 20-2-1050 (b) (Michie 1996)).”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cty. Sch. Dist. (11th Cir. 1997). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act's enforcement be enjoined.”
— 20-2-1050(c) — 3 cases
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 112 F.3d 1464 (11th Cir. 1997). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act’s enforcement be enjoined.”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cnty. Sch. Dist., 895 F. Supp. 1564 (N.D. Ga. 1995). “Laws 256 (1994) (codified at O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (Supp.1995)). Plaintiff Brian Gillespie Bown (“Bown”), a school teacher at South Gwinnett High School, filed this declaratory judgment action seeking a declaration that the Act is unconstitutional in its entirety and requesting…”
Bown v. Gwinnett Cty. Sch. Dist. (11th Cir. 1997). “O.C.G.A. § 20-2-1050 (1996). Appellant Brian Gillespie Bown filed this suit seeking a declaratory judgment that the Act violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment and requesting that the Act's enforcement be enjoined.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.