Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §20-2-506, enacted by Ga. L. 1990, p. 1035, § 2; Ga. L. 1996, p. 1075, § 1; Ga. L. 1997, p. 919, § 1; Ga. L. 1998, p. 128, § 20.)
- Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1990, a comma was inserted following "1990" in subsection (f) (now subsection (g)).
Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 1997, a semicolon was substituted for a period at the end of paragraph (b)(4).
- Ga. L. 1996, p. 1075, § 2, not codified by the General Assembly, provides: "This Act shall become effective July 1, 1996. Nothing in this Act shall be construed to invalidate or impair any contract entered into prior to said effective date."
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, § 32-928, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
"Appropriation" means funds received from all sources for the support of the public schools for the current fiscal year. Lewis v. Board of Educ., 183 Ga. 687, 189 S.E. 233 (1936) (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- If an alleged indebtedness was created subsequently to the estimate of sums due and unpaid forwarded by the county educational authorities to the State School Superintendent and was in excess of the funds appropriated for the current year, the obligation was void. Hicks v. Groves, 177 Ga. 574, 170 S.E. 877 (1933), aff'd, 179 Ga. 464, 176 S.E. 26 (1934) (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- When the payment of the indebtedness due to the petitioner by the county board of education was not provided for as an estimated expenditure from the funds included in the budget filed by the county board with the State Board of Education, the petitioner was not legally entitled to compel payment out of the funds included in the budget, and equity would not impound the funds for the purpose of compelling payment. Lewis v. Board of Educ., 183 Ga. 687, 189 S.E. 233 (1936) (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- In light of the similarities of the statutory provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, § 32-928, which was subsequently repealed but was succeeded by provisions in this Code section, are included in the annotations for this Code section.
Section was designed to prohibit a county board from binding the board's successors. 1948-49 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 101 (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
§ 20-2-506(b)(4). - O.C.G.A. § 20- 2-506(b)(4) did not apply to a specific contract between a city and a city building authority with respect to outstanding revenue bonds of the building authority. 2002 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U2002-2.
- O.C.G.A. § 20-2-506 does not prevent a local board of education from legally entering into a contract to employ a school superintendent for a period which extends beyond the current fiscal year so long as that contract, along with all other obligations of the system for that year, does not exceed total appropriations for the current fiscal year; however, unless specifically permitted by local law, such a contract may be prevented by the principle established in Williams v. City Council, 68 Ga. 816 (1882), which held that a municipal corporation may not by ordinance bind itself and the municipality's successors to a given line of policy, though the municipality may bind itself and the municipality's successors by any contract which the municipality has the right to make under the municipality's charter. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-14.
In the absence of local law, the term of a teacher's contract is limited to a single year as a matter of law. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 756 (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- County school board has no further responsibilities or obligations toward an employee after the board has fulfilled all of the terms of the employee's one-year contract. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 756 (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- County board of education is not authorized to sell a recently erected school building and at the same time buy back the same building, to be paid for over a period of years, to obtain funds with which to equip the building and other buildings in the school system. 1952-53 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 72 (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
Lease agreement whereunder board leases buses for single year is not on the agreement's face illegal merely because the agreement also gives the school board three one-year renewal options coupled with a purchase option exercisable at the end of the final renewal period; such an agreement might be subject to attack, however, if the yearly "rental payments" are so grossly in excess of what reasonably could be considered to be the "fair rental value" of the buses as to lead to a conclusion that the transaction, while disguised as a lease plus purchase option, is essentially a "conditional sale." 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 65-33 (decided under former Code 1933, § 32-928).
- 68 Am. Jur. 2d, Schools, § 136 et seq.
- 78A C.J.S., Schools and School Districts, §§ 703, 704, 712 et seq.
Total Results: 1
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-05-29
Citation: 291 Ga. 111, 728 S.E.2d 184, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 1765, 2012 WL 1909346, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 487
Snippet: not contain the provisions required by OCGA § 20-2-506 (b). The trial court denied the motion to dismiss