Proceeding before special master.

- Superior court did not err in holding that condemnor county board of education was authorized to proceed under special master act in exercising power of eminent domain. Mallory v. Upson County Bd. of Educ., 163 Ga. App. 377, 294 S.E.2d 599 (1982).

The 1967 amendment to the special master act should be construed as evidencing legislative intent that special master proceeding be considered a "supplementary" and "cumulative" form of condemnation in all cases wherein condemnor otherwise possesses power of eminent domain. Mallory v. Upson County Bd. of Educ., 163 Ga. App. 377, 294 S.E.2d 599 (1982).

Adequate notice to those whose property condemned states condemnation's purpose.

- Resolution in order to give adequate notice of purpose to those whose property is being condemned need not go into a detailed analysis of what type of school facility or building is being contemplated so long as the notice sufficiently puts one on notice that the condemnation is for public school purposes or for educational purposes as authorized by Ga. L. 1956, p. 100, § 1. Sheppard v. DeKalb County Bd. of Educ., 220 Ga. 219, 138 S.E.2d 271 (1964).

Separate equitable petition enjoining condemnation not valid.

- Plaintiff's claim that the defendants' intentions in planning to condemn the plaintiff's property without public need and without the funds to pay for the property presented a threat of irreparable harm to the plaintiff in the future was not cognizable under Georgia law because a separate equitable petition to enjoin a condemnation governed by the statute will not lie. Saffold v. Carter, 739 F. Supp. 1541 (S.D. Ga. 1990).

Cited in Herren v. Board of Educ., 219 Ga. 431, 134 S.E.2d 6 (1963).

ALR.

- Amount of property which may be condemned for public school, 71 A.L.R.2d 1071.

Zoning regulations as applied to public elementary and high schools, 74 A.L.R.3d 136.

Cross references.

- Execution and judicial sales generally, T. 9, C. 13.

Law reviews.

- For article, "School Systems, Segregation and the Supreme Court," see 6 Mercer L. Rev. 189 (1955). For article, "Public Authorities: Legislative Panacea?," see 5 J. of Pub. L. 387 (1956).

Not policy of authority to join in city annexation application.

- It is not the policy of the authority to join in an application for annexation of state-owned property to a city. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-229.

Municipalities or counties cannot require building fees for construction on authority property.

- Building permit fees may not be legally required by municipalities or counties of contractors on buildings being constructed for the authority on authority property. 1963-65 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 493.

Authority does not directly supervise construction projects of less than $200,000.00.

- When allotted funds from the State Board of Education for school construction result in construction projects of less than $200,000.00, the authority does not directly supervise construction but requires the local school system to construct the project itself and then be reimbursed by the authority; this procedure often makes it necessary for the local school system to borrow a substantial part of the construction costs for a period of nine months to a year; such borrowing is within the legal power of local school systems. 1968 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 68-18.

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 30 Am. Jur. 2d, Executions and Enforcement of Judgments, §§ 167, 168.

C.J.S.

- 33 C.J.S., Executions, § 42.