CopyCited 129 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Sep 9, 1987 | 257 Ga. 524
...ssue, we do not address several other issues that may have been or might have been raised prior to the hearing, such as the standing of the students to bring this action, and concerns relating to the establishment of the association pursuant to OCGA §
20-3-78 et seq....
CopyCited 13 times | Published | Supreme Court of Georgia | Nov 19, 1986 | 256 Ga. 443, 13 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1748
...ing an order to require the appellees to produce the requested documents. Coach Dooley, the Athletic Association, and *444 Drs. Davison and Barber in their capacities with the Athletic Association (hereinafter the private appellees), relying on OCGA §
20-3-78 et seq., [1] moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the Athletic Association was not subject to the Open Records Act because it was not a state agency. The Telegraph responded, inter alia, that OCGA §
20-3-78 et seq., are violative of the separation of powers doctrine of Article I, Section II, Paragraph III of the Georgia Constitution....
...ummary judgment to the Telegraph. We do so on the ground that the documents requested from the state appellees are "public records" within the meaning of the Open Records Act. We therefore find it unnecessary to address the constitutionality of OCGA §
20-3-78 et seq....
...pen Records Act. Judgment reversed in part. Gregory, Weltner, Hunt, JJ., and Judge A. Blenn Taylor, Jr., Judge Roger H. Lawson, Jr., and Judge James E. Findley, concur. Marshall, C. J., Clarke, P. J., and Smith, J., not participating. NOTES [1] OCGA §
20-3-78 provides that the athletic associations of the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech, and any other branch of the University System are private corporations....