O.C.G.A.
O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 20-4-18 (2019)

Management and control of adult literacy and postsecondary technical education programs and schools

✓ O.C.G.A. (archive.org 2024 item): print volumes of 2004-2024, per-volume vintage; older volumes partly replaced by 2019 Release 73 text; no 2025 or 2026 Acts
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

Subject to the provisions of Code Section 20-4-20, any other Code section of this article to the contrary notwithstanding, all decisions regarding the delivery of adult literacy and postsecondary technical education programs and services to business, industry, and individuals who are 16 years of age or older and who have completed or left the public schools, to include the awarding of high school equivalency certificates, shall be made by the Technical College System of Georgia. Commensurate with this authority, the system shall exercise state level management and operational control over adult literacy education programs, postsecondary technical schools, and adult vocational centers.

History

(Code 1981, § 20-4-18, enacted by Ga. L. 1988, p. 1252, § 2; Ga. L. 2008, p. 335, § 2/SB 435.)

Annotations

Code Commission notes. - Pursuant to Code Section 28-9-5, in 2008, ‘‘system’’

was substituted for ‘‘department’’ near the end of this Code section.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 1 case (1 in the last 5 years), 2021–2021 · leading case: Ranson-dillard v. Technical Coll. Sys. of Georgia, No. 7:20-cv-00247 (M.D. Ga. May 19, 2021).
Sort: Relevance Newest Treatment
Ranson-dillard v. Technical Coll. Sys. of Georgia, No. 7:20-cv-00247 (M.D. Ga. May 19, 2021). · cites it 2× “Rule 17(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure instructs that a defendant’s capacity to be sued is determined “by the law of the state where the court is located.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.