O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 21-2-280 (2019)

Requirement as to conduct of primaries and elections by ballot; requirement as to use of official ballots only

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

All primaries and elections in this state shall be conducted by ballot,

except when voting machines are used as provided by law. A ballot may be electronic or printed on paper. All ballots used in any primary or election shall be provided by the superintendent or municipal governing authority in accordance with this article, and only official ballots furnished by the superintendent or governing authority shall be cast or counted in any primary or election in any precinct in which ballots are used.

History

Ga. L. 1962, p. 618, § 1; Code 1933, § 34-1101, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1983, p. 140, § 1;

Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1; Ga. L. 2002, p. 598, § 2-2; Ga. L. 2005, p. 253, § 33/HB 244.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS Omission of directions on ballots. - A trial court properly denied a losing candidate’s petition to contest the election results of a mayoral election held in a town as the losing candidate failed to meet the burden of establishing that any misconduct, fraud, or irregularity occurred that placed the result of the election in doubt based on the county clerk signing the document reflecting the election results, instead of the election superintendent, and the clerk’s failure to purge the voters list, which was not an obligation of the election supervisor anyway. The omission of the statutory language providing directions on how to cast a vote likewise did not necessitate a new election since the poll manager testified that the poll manager and other poll workers instructed each voter how to fill out the ballot and established that there was no

concern or confusion by the voters regarding the ballot. Lewis v. O’Day, 284 Ga. 423, 667 S.E.2d 594, 2008 Ga. LEXIS 820 (2008). Methods of voting. - O.C.G.A. § 212-280, by exempting electronic voting from the requirement that elections be conducted by ballot, does not violate Ga. Const. 1983, Art. II, Sec. I, Para. I because nothing in Ga. Const. 1983, Art. II, Sec. I, Para. I limits voting to some method or methods under which each voter indicates his or her choice or choices on a separate piece of paper issued to him or her for that purpose; it contemplates that the legislature shall provide a method, or methods, of voting at elections in such a way that not even those who count or tabulate the votes will know how any particular voter voted. Favorito v. Handel, 285 Ga. 795, 684 S.E.2d 257, 2009 Ga. LEXIS 486 (2009).

RESEARCH REFERENCES Am. Jur. 2d. 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, §§ 283, 285. C.J.S. 29 C.J.S., Elections, §§ 260, 262. ALR. Failure to make available to voters offi-

cial ballots, or ballots conforming to requirements, as affecting validity of election of public officer, 165 A.L.R. 1263.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 2008–2009 · leading case: Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009).
Favorito v. Handel, 684 S.E.2d 257 (Ga. 2009). · cites it 2× “Appellants further contend that OCGA § 21-2-280, by exempting electronic voting from the requirement that elections be conducted by ballot, violates Art.”
Lewis v. O'DAY, 667 S.E.2d 594 (Ga. 2008). · cites it 2× “The printed ballot, however, failed to contain the directions that explain how to cast a vote, as required by OCGA § 21-2-285 (b) (1), or the voter fraud language, as required by subsection (h) of that statute.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.