Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 21-2-409 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 21 ELECTIONS

Section 2. Elections and Primaries Generally, 21-2-1 through 21-2-604.

ARTICLE 11 PREPARATION FOR AND CONDUCT OF PRIMARIES AND ELECTIONS

21-2-409. Assisting electors who cannot read English or who have disabilities.

  1. No elector shall receive any assistance in voting at any primary or election unless he or she is unable to read the English language or he or she has a disability which renders him or her unable to see or mark the ballot or operate the voting equipment or to enter the voting compartment or booth without assistance. A person assisting an elector shall identify himself or herself to a poll worker who shall record such information on the disabled elector's voter certificate showing that such person provided assistance in voting to such elector.
    1. In elections in which there is a federal candidate on the ballot, any elector who is entitled to receive assistance in voting under this Code section shall be permitted by the managers to select any person of the elector's choice except such elector's employer or agent of that employer or officer or agent of such elector's union.
    2. In all other elections, any elector who is entitled to receive assistance in voting under this Code section shall be permitted by the managers to select:
      1. Any elector, except a poll officer or poll watcher, who is a resident of the precinct in which the elector requiring assistance is attempting to vote; or
      2. The mother, father, grandparent, aunt, uncle, sister, brother, spouse, son, daughter, niece, nephew, grandchild, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, or attendant care provider of the elector entitled to receive assistance

        to enter the voting compartment or booth with him or her to assist in voting, such assistance to be rendered inside the voting compartment or booth. No person shall assist more than ten such electors in any primary, election, or runoff covered by this paragraph. No person whose name appears on the ballot as a candidate at a particular election nor the mother, father, grandparent, aunt, uncle, sister, brother, spouse, son, daughter, niece, nephew, grandchild, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law of that candidate shall offer assistance during that particular election under the provisions of this Code section to any voter who is not related to such candidate. For the purposes of this paragraph, "related to such candidate" shall mean the candidate's mother, father, grandparent, aunt, uncle, sister, brother, spouse, son, daughter, niece, nephew, grandchild, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, or sister-in-law.

(Ga. L. 1922, p. 97, § 4; Code 1933, § 34-1905; Code 1933, § 34-1317, enacted by Ga. L. 1964, Ex. Sess., p. 26, § 1; Ga. L. 1966, p. 185, § 1; Ga. L. 1968, p. 871, § 13; Ga. L. 1969, p. 285, § 4; Code 1933, § 34-1312, as redesignated by Ga. L. 1969, p. 308, § 18; Ga. L. 1981, p. 1718, § 6; Ga. L. 1982, p. 1512, § 5; Ga. L. 1983, p. 140, § 1; Ga. L. 1989, p. 911, § 1; Ga. L. 1990, p. 53, § 1; Ga. L. 1996, p. 145, § 18; Ga. L. 1998, p. 295, § 1; Ga. L. 2001, p. 240, § 38; Ga. L. 2003, p. 517, § 45; Ga. L. 2004, p. 103, § 1; Ga. L. 2006, p. 888, § 6/HB 1435; Ga. L. 2008, p. 781, § 11/HB 1112.)

The 2006 amendment, effective January 1, 2007, in subsection (a), deleted "physical" preceding "disability" in the first sentence, substituted the present second sentence for the former second sentence, which read "The elector shall take an oath that shall be administered to him or her and placed in writing by a manager, giving the reason why the elector requires assistance.", and deleted the former last three sentences, which read "The printed name and the signature of such person assisting the elector shall be provided on the oath. An elector who declares that by reason of blindness he or she is unable to cast a vote as he or she wishes may receive assistance on the basis of the blind elector's declaration without the necessity of an oath. The printed name and the signature of such person assisting a blind elector shall be provided on the declaration."

The 2008 amendment, effective July 1, 2008, in paragraph (b)(1), substituted "such elector's" for "the elector's" twice; redesignated former subparagraphs (b)(2)(1) and (b)(2)(2) as subparagraphs (b)(2)(A) and (b)(2)(B), respectively; in subparagraph (b)(2)(B), substituted "grandparent, aunt, uncle, sister, brother, spouse, son, daughter, niece, nephew, grandchild, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, mother-in-law, father-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law, or attendant care provider" for "sister, brother, spouse, or child", and in the undesignated text, substituted "shall offer" for "may offer" in the second sentence; and deleted former subsection (c), which read: "The oaths or declarations of assisted electors shall be returned by the chief manager to the superintendent. The oaths or declarations of assisted electors shall be available in the superintendent's office for public inspection.".

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Failure to give required oaths to voters receiving assistance along with other irregularities were sufficient to cast doubt on the results of an election. McCranie v. Mullis, 267 Ga. 416, 478 S.E.2d 377 (1996).

Investigation into whether voter activist was a convicted felon did not support civil claim.

- Evidence that an elections official and a sheriff discussed and questioned a political activist about rumors that the activist was a convicted felon did not support a fourteenth amendment claim for purposes of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3) since the activist failed to provide evidence of malicious intent or conduct that shocked the conscience, the activist failed to establish a constitutional violation, a necessary element of a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 or 42 U.S.C. § 1985(3). Moore v. Nelson, 394 F. Supp. 2d 1365 (M.D. Ga. 2005).

Invalidation of election reversed on appeal.

- Trial court erred by invalidating an election for sheriff and ordering a new election because the evidence of systemic misconduct for vote buying and alleged wrongful distribution of absentee ballots was speculative and insufficient to support the trial court's conclusion that irregularities cause doubt on the results. Meade v. Williamson, 293 Ga. 142, 745 S.E.2d 279 (2013).

OPINIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the provisions, opinions under former Code 1933, §§ 34-1903 and 34-1905 are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Restrictions unenforceable in presidential preference primary.

- The restrictions contained in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-409, limiting the class of persons permitted to assist disabled or illiterate electors at the polls, and the restrictions contained in O.C.G.A. § 21-2-385, limiting the class of persons permitted to assist disabled or illiterate electors voting by absentee ballot, cannot be enforced in the presidential preference primary nor can the limitations contained in these Code sections concerning the number of persons one individual may assist be enforced. 1984 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 84-15.

No poll officer may provide voting assistance to an elector. 1965-66 Op. Att'y Gen. No. 66-182.

Voter's determination as to need of assistance.

- Whether a particular person would qualify under former Code 1933, § 34-1903 (see O.C.G.A. § 21-2-586) was a question which addressed itself to the voter, inasmuch as the voter must state under oath that the voter needs assistance. 1958-59 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 148 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34-1903).

Voter may be administered the oath by any of the managers or by a notary public or other officer qualified to administer oaths. 1948-49 Op. Att'y Gen. p. 204 (decided under former Code 1933, § 34-1905).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Elections, § 309 et seq.

C.J.S.

- 29 C.J.S., Elections, §§ 321, 327, 328.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 21-2-409 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

Meade v. Williamson

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2013-06-03

Citation: 293 Ga. 142, 745 S.E.2d 279, 2013 Fulton County D. Rep. 1678, 2013 WL 2372260, 2013 Ga. LEXIS 502

Snippet: qualified to assist these voters pursuant to OCGA § 21-2-409 (b) (2) and another voter was assisted by a person

McCranie v. Mullis

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1996-12-05

Citation: 478 S.E.2d 377, 267 Ga. 416, 96 Fulton County D. Rep. 4292, 1996 Ga. LEXIS 940

Snippet: receiving assistance in voting.[6] O.C.G.A. § 21-2-409 provides that a voter may receive assistance in