Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 22-1-3 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 22 EMINENT DOMAIN

Section 1. General Provisions, 22-1-1 through 22-1-15.

22-1-3. Power of General Assembly to determine when right of eminent domain may be exercised; duty of courts as to laws authorizing the condemnation of private property for private uses.

It is the province of the General Assembly to determine when the right of eminent domain may be exercised. If, however, under pretext of such necessity the General Assembly should pass a law authorizing the taking of property for private use rather than for public use, the courts should declare the law inoperative.

(Orig. Code 1863, § 2202; Code 1868, § 2197; Code 1873, § 2223; Code 1882, § 2223; Civil Code 1895, § 3053; Civil Code 1910, § 3625; Code 1933, § 36-102.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Taking property for public use is legislative, not judicial, function.

- The necessity or expediency of appropriating particular property for public use is not a matter of judicial cognizance, but one for the determination of the legislative branch of the government, and this must obviously be so where the state takes for its own purposes. State Hwy. Dep't v. Smith, 219 Ga. 800, 136 S.E.2d 334 (1964).

And Legislature has exercised jurisdiction granted by section.

- In the exercise of the jurisdiction granted by this section, the Legislature passed acts which are embodied in this Code as §§ 44-8-4 and22-3-20. Central Ga. Power Co. v. Ham, 139 Ga. 569, 77 S.E. 396 (1913).

Notice to owner not required before determination of necessity.

- Since the necessity for taking private property for a public use is a legislative and not a judicial function, due process does not require notice to the owner nor an opportunity to be heard by him before such determination can be made. State Hwy. Dep't v. Smith, 219 Ga. 800, 136 S.E.2d 334 (1964).

Cited in Williamson v. Housing Auth., 186 Ga. 673, 199 S.E. 43 (1938); Russell v. Venable, 216 Ga. 137, 115 S.E.2d 103 (1960); Norton Realty & Loan Co. v. Board of Educ., 129 Ga. App. 668, 200 S.E.2d 461 (1973); DOT v. City of Atlanta, 255 Ga. 124, 337 S.E.2d 327 (1985).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 26 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, §§ 5, 38.

C.J.S.

- 29A C.J.S., Eminent Domain, §§ 19, 29-31, 87, 88.

ALR.

- Exercise of eminent domain to control the use or improvement of property not taken, 23 A.L.R. 876.

Right of abutting owner to compensation for interference with access by bridge or other structure in public street or highway, 45 A.L.R. 534.

Constitutionality of statute conferring power of eminent domain on private corporation or association for educational, religious, or recreational purpose, 50 A.L.R. 1530.

Public benefit or convenience as distinguished from use by the public as ground for the exercise of the power of eminent domain, 54 A.L.R. 7.

Power to condemn, or authorize the condemnation of, capital stock of a public utility, 81 A.L.R. 1071.

Diversion of park property to other uses as taking or damaging neighboring property without compensation, 83 A.L.R. 1435.

Injunction against exercise of power of eminent domain, 133 A.L.R. 11, 93 A.L.R.2d 465.

Eminent domain: possibility of overcoming specific obstacles to contemplated use as element in determining existence of necessary public use, 22 A.L.R.4th 840.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 22-1-3 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

Harvey v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-02-27

Citation: 300 Ga. 598, 797 S.E.2d 75, 2017 WL 764010, 2017 Ga. LEXIS 102

Snippet: his previous conviction. See generally OCGA § 16-2-21. 3. Armentress Hill, who shared a cell with appellant

SOUTHERN LNG, INC. v. MacGINNITIE

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-03

Citation: 294 Ga. 657, 755 S.E.2d 683

Snippet: therefore a “public utility” under OCGA § 48-1-2 (21),3 and thus that Southern must file its ad valorem