Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 22-3-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 22 EMINENT DOMAIN

Section 3. Exercise of Power of Eminent Domain for Special Purposes, 22-3-1 through 22-3-162.

ARTICLE 1 CONSTRUCTION, MAINTENANCE, ETC., OF TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE LINES ALONG RAILROAD RIGHTS OF WAY

22-3-2. Manner of service of notice.

Notice of condemnation shall be served upon the railroad company in the manner provided for the service of other actions upon railroad companies. It shall not be necessary to serve such notice upon any person or corporation other than the railroad company in possession of and operating the railroad whose right of way is sought to be condemned by the telegraph or telephone company for its use; and only the interest of such railroad company so served shall be affected by the proceedings.

(Ga. L. 1898, p. 54, § 1; Civil Code 1910, § 5237; Code 1933, § 36-702.)

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

This procedure affords due process of law to the railroad companies whose property is sought to be condemned. Savannah, Fla. & W. Ry. v. Postal Telegraph-Cable Co., 115 Ga. 554, 42 S.E. 1 (1902); Western & Atl. R.R. v. Western Union Tel. Co., 138 Ga. 420, 75 S.E. 471, 42 L.R.A. (n.s.) 225 (1912).

Contract alternative.

- Cable company that possessed certificate of authorization from Georgia Public Service Commission that allowed it to exercise eminent domain under O.C.G.A. § 46-5-1(a) properly entered into contract with railroad, in lieu of eminent domain proceedings, to allow construction of communication lines along railroad's rights of way. Davis v. Williams Communs., Inc., 258 F. Supp. 2d 1348 (N.D. Ga. 2003).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

Am. Jur. 2d.

- 27 Am. Jur. 2d, Eminent Domain, §§ 391, 394.

C.J.S.

- 30 C.J.S., Eminent Domain, §§ 245-249.

ALR.

- Eminent domain: permissible modes of service of notice of proceedings, 89 A.L.R.2d 1404.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 22-3-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 3

Dep't of Labor v. Mcconnell

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-05-20

Citation: 828 S.E.2d 352, 305 Ga. 812

Snippet: of "loss" that McConnell alleged. OCGA § 50-21-22 (3).2 The trial court also held that each count of the

Smith v. Travis Pruitt & Associates, P.C.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-04-10

Citation: 265 Ga. 347, 455 S.E.2d 586

Snippet: regarding the application here of OCGA § 18-2-22 (3). 2. We agree with appellants that the trial court

Wright v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1953-10-13

Citation: 78 S.E.2d 494, 210 Ga. 212, 1953 Ga. LEXIS 521

Snippet: conviction. Code § 38-420; Burns v. State, 188 Ga. 22 (3) (2 S. E. 2d 627); Moore v. State, 193 Ga. 877 (20