O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 22-4-9 (2019)

Policies guiding acquisition of real property for federal-aid projects

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

In acquiring real property for any federal-aid project, the costs of which are financed in whole or in part from federal funds allocated to an acquiring public entity, such public entity shall be guided by the land acquisition policies required by Section 301 of the Uniform Act to the greatest extent practicable.

History

Ga. L. 1973, p. 512, § 8; Ga. L. 1989, p. 213, § 8.

Annotations

JUDICIAL DECISIONS No private right of action. - O.C.G.A. § 22-4-9 does not create a private right of action in favor of a landowner, but merely addresses policies that should guide state agencies when the agencies acquire real property for federal-aid projects. Benton v. Savannah Airport Comm’n, 241 Ga. App. 536, 525 S.E.2d 383 (1999). Neither the Uniform Relocation Assis-

tance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act, 42 U.S.C. § 4601 et seq., nor the Georgia Relocation Assistance and Land Acquisition Policy Act, O.C.G.A. § 22-4-1 et seq., gave condemnees whose land was subjected to an inadequately described temporary work easement a private right of action. Ga. 400 Indus. Park, Inc. v. DOT, 274 Ga. App. 153, 616 S.E.2d 903 (2005).

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1999–2005 · leading case: Benton v. Savannah Airport Comm'n, 525 S.E.2d 383 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999).
Benton v. Savannah Airport Comm'n, 525 S.E.2d 383 (Ga. Ct. App. 1999). · cites it 4× “The Bentons contend the Commission violated OCGA § 22-4-9, which provides that a state entity shall be guided by the federal land acquisition procedures to the greatest extent possible.”
Georgia 400 Indus. Park, Inc. v. Dep't of Transp., 616 S.E.2d 903 (Ga. Ct. App. 2005). · cites it 4× “26 Condemnees contend the DOT violated OCGA § 22-4-9, which sets forth procedures for public entities acquiring real property for any federal-aid public works project.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.