Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448Sales under decrees in equity shall be subject to confirmation by the judge, who has a large discretion vested in him in reference thereto. Such sales shall not be consummated until confirmed by him.
(Civil Code 1895, § 4856; Civil Code 1910, § 5429; Code 1933, § 37-1206.)
- This section is derived from the decisions in Walter v. Hargrove, 61 Ga. 267 (1878) and Holmes v. Harris, 70 Ga. 309 (1883).
- For survey article on business associations, see 34 Mercer L. Rev. 13 (1982). For article, "Buying Distressed Commercial Real Estate: What are the Alternatives?," see 16 (No. 4) Ga. St. B.J. 18 (2010).
Cited in Wingfield v. Bennett, 36 Ga. App. 27, 134 S.E. 840 (1926); Dockery v. Parks, 117 Ga. App. 589, 161 S.E.2d 406 (1968); Dockery v. Parks, 224 Ga. 369, 162 S.E.2d 332 (1968); Brannon v. Simpson, 244 Ga. 58, 257 S.E.2d 541 (1979); Leggett v. Ogden, 248 Ga. 403, 284 S.E.2d 1 (1981); Pack v. Mahan, 294 Ga. 496, 755 S.E.2d 126 (2014).
Judgment rendered upon a jury verdict finding a sale valid is sufficient confirmation to meet the requirements of this section. Palmour v. Roper, 119 Ga. 10, 45 S.E. 790 (1903).
- The discretion of the judge is a sound legal discretion and he cannot arbitrarily withhold his confirmation of a sale made under decree of the court. Pledger v. Bank of Lyerly, 157 Ga. 229, 121 S.E. 228 (1924).
- Where, in a suit to enjoin an exercise of a power of sale contained in a security deed, the sale was allowed to proceed subject to confirmation by the court, and on the question of confirmation, subsequently arising, the existence of the facts alleged as grounds of objection was the sole issue presented, and such issue was a matter of dispute under the evidence, the judge did not abuse his discretion in decreeing confirmation. Wilson v. Trustees of Union Theological Sem., 181 Ga. 755, 184 S.E. 290 (1936).
A confirmation of a sale when there is a variance between the advertisement and the terms of the order of sale constitutes error. Slaughter v. Strother, 99 Ga. 633, 27 S.E. 764 (1896).
After a judicial sale has been confirmed, the court has no discretion to rescind it except upon some special ground, such as fraud, accident, or mistake, which has worked an injustice, and which was unknown to the complaining party at the time of confirmation. Hurt Bldg., Inc. v. Atlanta Trust Co., 181 Ga. 274, 182 S.E. 187 (1935).
- Doctrine of equitable conversion as affected by discretion as to time, manner or other circumstances of sale, where the duty to sell is mandatory, 124 A.L.R. 1448.
Total Results: 2
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-03-17
Citation: 294 Ga. 787, 756 S.E.2d 504, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 517, 2014 WL 998691, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 220
Snippet: to be consummated until confirmed. See OCGA § 23-4-35. 3 The court did not abuse its discretion
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-02-24
Citation: 294 Ga. 496, 755 S.E.2d 126, 2014 Fulton County D. Rep. 272, 2014 WL 695173, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 112
Snippet: proceedings are also subject to confirmation. See OCGA § 23-4-35; Brannon v. Simpson, 244 Ga. 58