Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 24-1-2 | Car Wreck Lawyer

Link to State of Georgia Official Statute 2018 Georgia Code Annotated (sourced from legal.resource.org)
O.C.G.A. 24-1-2 Case Law from Google Scholar Amendments to OCGA 24-1-2

TITLE 24 EVIDENCE

Section 1. General Provisions, 24-1-1 through 24-1-106.

ARTICLE 1 PURPOSE AND APPLICABILITY OF RULES OF EVIDENCE

24-1-2. Applicability of the rules of evidence.

  1. The rules of evidence shall apply in all trials by jury in any court in this state.
  2. The rules of evidence shall apply generally to all nonjury trials and other fact-finding proceedings of any court in this state subject to the limitations set forth in subsections (c) and (d) of this Code section.
  3. The rules of evidence, except those with respect to privileges, shall not apply in the following situations:
    1. The determination of questions of fact preliminary to admissibility of evidence when the issue is to be determined by the court under Code Section 24-1-104;
    2. Criminal proceedings before grand juries;
    3. Proceedings for extradition or rendition;
    4. Proceedings for revoking parole;
    5. Proceedings for the issuance of warrants for arrest and search warrants except as provided by subsection (b) of Code Section 17-4-40;
    6. Proceedings with respect to release on bond;
    7. Dispositional hearings and custody hearings in juvenile court; or
    8. Contempt proceedings in which the court, pursuant to subsection (a) of Code Section 15-1-4, may act summarily.
    1. In criminal commitment or preliminary hearings in any court, the rules of evidence shall apply except that hearsay shall be admissible.
    2. In in rem forfeiture proceedings, the rules of evidence shall apply except that hearsay shall be admissible in determining probable cause or reasonable cause.
    3. In presentence hearings, the rules of evidence shall apply except that hearsay and character evidence shall be admissible.
    4. In administrative hearings, the rules of evidence as applied in the trial of nonjury civil actions shall be followed, subject to special statutory rules or agency rules as authorized by law.
  5. Except as modified by statute, the common law as expounded by Georgia courts shall continue to be applied to the admission and exclusion of evidence and to procedures at trial.

(Code 1981, §24-1-2, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.)

Cross references.

- Applicability of the rules, Fed. R. Evid. 1101.

Law reviews.

- For article on the 2011 enactment of this Code section, see 28 Ga. St. U.L. Rev. 1 (2011). For annual survey of evidence law, see 67 Mercer L. Rev. 63 (2015).

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Application of rules of evidence.

- Under Georgia's new Evidence Code, unless a fact-finding proceeding involves one of the 12 situations enumerated in O.C.G.A. § 24-1-2(c) and (d), the rules of evidence fully apply; similarity to one or more of the enumerated situations is insufficient to limit the applicability of the evidence rules. Parker v. State, 296 Ga. 586, 769 S.E.2d 329 (2015).

Error in application of hearsay rules in determining material witness status.

- Trial court erred in applying the hearsay rules to exclude the appellant's proffered documents from the evidence the court considered in ruling on a motion for material witness certificates as to the Kentucky-based manufacturer of the breathalyzer because an exception under O.C.G.A. § 24-1-2(c)(1) applied. Parker v. State, 296 Ga. 586, 769 S.E.2d 329 (2015).

Long standing requirement for admission of victim's character evidence not changed.

- There is no reason to construe the rules regarding the admission of character evidence as a modification of Georgia's long-standing requirement that a defendant must first make a prima facie showing of self-defense before requiring a trial court to determine whether evidence pertaining to the victim's character is admissible. Oliver v. State, 329 Ga. App. 377, 765 S.E.2d 606 (2014).

Cited in Taylor v. State, 337 Ga. App. 486, 788 S.E.2d 97 (2016); W. Sky Fin., LLC v. State of Ga. ex rel. Olens, 300 Ga. 340, 793 S.E.2d 357 (2016).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Applicability of rules of evidence in juvenile delinquency proceeding, 43 A.L.R.2d 1128.

Applicability of rules of evidence to juvenile transfer, waiver, or certification hearings, 37 A.L.R.5th 703.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 24-1-2 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 18

State v. LEDBETTER (And Vice Versa)

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2024-03-05

Snippet: affidavits in support of search warrants. See OCGA § 24-1-2 (c) (5) (explaining that generally “[t]he rules

State v. Orr

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-05-06

Citation: 827 S.E.2d 892, 305 Ga. 729

Snippet: found at Ga. L. 2011, p. 100, § 1). See also OCGA § 24-1-2 (e) ("Except as modified by statute , the common

Chrysler Grp. LLC v. Walden

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2018-03-15

Citation: 812 S.E.2d 244

Snippet: Evidence Code addresses old common law rules in OCGA § 24-1-2 (e), which provides that "[e]xcept as modified

Western Sky Financial, LLC v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2016-10-31

Citation: 300 Ga. 340, 793 S.E.2d 357, 2016 Ga. LEXIS 783

Snippet: proceedings are not expressly exempted. See OCGA§ 24-1-2; Parker v. State, 296 Ga. 586 (2) (a) (769 SE2d

State v. Chulpayev

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27

Snippet: proceedings in which the hearsay rules apply. See OCGA § 24-1-2 (setting forth the proceedings in which all or

State v. Chulpayev

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-03-27

Citation: 296 Ga. 764, 770 S.E.2d 808

Snippet: proceedings in which the hearsay rules apply. See OCGA § 24-1-2 (setting forth the proceedings in which all or

Parker v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-02-16

Snippet: OCGA § 24-1-2 (b), unless an exception applies — but an exception does apply. Under OCGA § 24-1-2 (c) (1)

Parker v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-02-16

Citation: 296 Ga. 586, 769 S.E.2d 329, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 133

Snippet: OCGA § 24-1-2 (b), unless an exception applies — but an exception does apply. Under OCGA § 24-1-2 (c) (1)

Leitch v. Fleming

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-15

Citation: 291 Ga. 669, 732 S.E.2d 401, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 3128, 2012 WL 4855352, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 771

Snippet: claimed exists. Effective January 1, 2013, OCGA § 24-1-2 (d) (1) expressly provides, “In criminal commitment

Young v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2012-10-01

Citation: 291 Ga. 627, 732 S.E.2d 269, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 2916, 2012 WL 4475667, 2012 Ga. LEXIS 747

Snippet: as the *631appellate courts are guided by OCGA § 24-1-2, which provides that ‘the object of all legal investigation

Kendrick v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2010-07-05

Citation: 699 S.E.2d 302, 287 Ga. 676, 2010 Fulton County D. Rep. 2198, 2010 Ga. LEXIS 511

Snippet: the context of an automobile. See OCGA § 16-3-24.1.[2] First, it must be noted that Kendrick did not

Taylor v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-10-09

Citation: 651 S.E.2d 715, 282 Ga. 502, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 3086, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 717

Snippet: as "[t]he appellate courts are guided by OCGA § 24-1-2," which provides that "`[t]he object of all legal

Ballard v. Meyers

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2002-11-12

Citation: 572 S.E.2d 572, 275 Ga. 819, 2002 Fulton County D. Rep. 3311, 2002 Ga. LEXIS 1006

Snippet: (1997) (emphasis supplied). See generally OCGA § 24-1-2 (“The object of all legal investigation is the

Tenet Healthcare Corp. v. Louisiana Forum Corp.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2000-11-13

Citation: 538 S.E.2d 441, 273 Ga. 206, 2000 Fulton County D. Rep. 4168, 2000 Ga. LEXIS 855

Snippet: "the object of all legal investigation." OCGA § 24-1-2. See also Annot., "Disclosure of Name, Identity

Brown v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1999-02-08

Citation: 512 S.E.2d 260, 270 Ga. 601, 99 Fulton County D. Rep. 562, 1999 Ga. LEXIS 263

Snippet: investigation is the discovery of truth. OCGA § 24-1-2. The jury in this case determined Brown’s guilt

Reed v. State of Georgia

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1995-06-12

Citation: 265 Ga. 458, 458 S.E.2d 113, 95 Fulton County D. Rep. 1997, 1995 Ga. LEXIS 373

Snippet: County Airport Auth. v. State of Ga., 265 Ga. 24 (1), (2) (453 SE2d 8) (1995). Here, as there, the county

Williams v. State

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1983-03-09

Citation: 300 S.E.2d 685, 250 Ga. 664, 1983 Ga. LEXIS 612

Snippet: truth. OCGA § 24-9-64 (Code Ann. § 38-1705); OCGA § 24-1-2 (Code Ann. § 38-101). As example, a witness may

Harris v. Hine

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1974-04-30

Citation: 205 S.E.2d 847, 232 Ga. 183, 14 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (West) 1101, 1974 Ga. LEXIS 900

Snippet: for at 30 cents per pound. Below Grade Cotton at 24 1/2 cents per pound. 2) All cotton ginned on or after