Syfert Injury Law Firm

Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation

Call Now: 904-383-7448

2018 Georgia Code 24-10-1006 | Car Wreck Lawyer

TITLE 24 EVIDENCE

Section 10. Best Evidence Rule, 24-10-1001 through 24-10-1008.

ARTICLE 2 SPECIFIC TYPES OF RECORDS AND EVIDENCE

24-10-1006. Summaries.

The contents of otherwise admissible voluminous writings, recordings, or photographs which cannot conveniently be examined in court may be presented in the form of a chart, summary, or calculation. The originals, or duplicates, shall be made available for examination or copying, or both, by other parties at a reasonable time and place. The court may order that the contents of such writings, recordings, or photographs be produced in court.

(Code 1981, §24-10-1006, enacted by Ga. L. 2011, p. 99, § 2/HB 24.)

Cross references.

- Summaries to prove content, Fed. R. Evid. 1006.

JUDICIAL DECISIONS

Editor's notes.

- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, decisions under former Code 1933, §§ 38-203, 38-205, and former O.C.G.A. § 24-5-29 are included in the annotations for this Code section.

Summary of accounting book entries.

- When pertinent and essential facts can be ascertained only by an examination of a large number of entries in books of account, an auditor or an expert accountant who has made an examination and analysis of the books and figures may testify as a witness and give summarized statements of what the books show as a result of the investigation, provided the books themselves are accessible to the court and the parties. Stewart v. State, 246 Ga. 70, 268 S.E.2d 906 (1980) (decided under former Code 1933, §§ 38-203, 38-205); Jackson v. Meadows, 157 Ga. App. 569, 278 S.E.2d 8 (1981);.

For a discussion of the admissibility of summaries of business records, see Tyner v. Sheriff, 164 Ga. App. 360, 297 S.E.2d 114 (1982) (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 24-5-29).

Loan history report properly admitted.

- Trial court properly admitted the bank's loan history report as a business record because the report provided a description of each transaction relating to the estate's loan from the loan's inception, along with a corresponding posting date for each transaction, the transaction amount, and any change to the principal balance resulting from the transaction, and was not a summary. Roberts v. Cmty. & S. Bank, 331 Ga. App. 364, 771 S.E.2d 68 (2015).

Bank's computer screen shot insufficient proof of damages in loan case.

- In an action on a loan, a bank did not submit sufficient evidence to prove the bank's damages because a printout of the bank's electronic records reflecting the amounts then owed, without a detailed transaction history, was a summary requiring evidence that the underlying records were too voluminous to examine in court pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 24-10-1006, not a business record under O.C.G.A. § 24-8-803(6). D'Agnese v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., 335 Ga. App. 659, 782 S.E.2d 714 (2016).

RESEARCH REFERENCES

ALR.

- Requirement of notice as condition for admission in evidence of summary of voluminous records, 80 A.L.R.3d 405.

Cases Citing Georgia Code 24-10-1006 From Courtlistener.com

Total Results: 2

Tafel v. Lion Antique Cars & Investments, Inc., A/K/A Lion Antique Investments & Consulting Services, Inc.

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15

Snippet: that the summary was admissible under OCGA § 24-10-1006 of our new Evidence Code.3 We disagree, as Tafel

TAFEL v. LION ANTIQUE CARS & INVESTMENTS, INC.; And Vice Versa

Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-06-15

Citation: 297 Ga. 334, 773 S.E.2d 743, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 443

Snippet: that the summary was admissible under OCGA § 24-10-1006 of our new Evidence Code. 3 We disagree