O.C.G.A.

O.C.G.A. § 27-3-130 (2019)

Short title

✓ O.C.G.A. — 2019 edition (Public.Resource.Org Release 73)
Code text and O.C.G.A. statutory annotations on this page reflect the 2019 Official Code of Georgia Annotated (Public.Resource.Org Release 73, 2019-08-21; public domain per Georgia v. Public.Resource.Org, 2020). The Syfert case-law annotations in Notes of Decisions, below, are current.
Find cases: SyfertCases citing this section GA-LEGlegis.ga.gov (official) JustiaJustia CornellLII Search CasesGoogle Scholar

This article shall be known and may be cited as the ‘‘Endangered Wildlife Act of 1973.’’

History

(Ga. L. 1973, p. 932, § 1.)

Annotations

RESEARCH REFERENCES ALR. - Construction and application of state endangered species acts, 44 A.L.R.6th 325. Construction and application of the consultation requirement under Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 1536(a) to (d), 1 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 4. Construction and application of threatened species requirements under Sec. 4(a) and (b) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C.A. § 1533(a) and (b), 6 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 2.

Construction and application of the cooperation with states requirement under Sec. 6 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C.A. § 1535, 8 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 3. Construction and application of prohibited acts under Sec. 9(a) of the Endangered Species Act of 1973, 16 U.S.C.A. § 1538(a), 9 A.L.R. Fed. 3d 3.

Notes of Decisions
Cited in 2 cases, 1986–2007 · leading case: Coastal Marshlands Prot. Comm. v. Ctr. for a Sustainable Coast, 649 S.E.2d 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007).
Coastal Marshlands Prot. Comm. v. Ctr. for a Sustainable Coast, 649 S.E.2d 619 (Ga. Ct. App. 2007). · cites it 4× “Although the CMPA did not require the Committee to consider the BA issued pursuant to the ESA, the Committee was furnished with a draft version of the BA dated February 2005 as it considered the permit application.”
Mountain States Legal Found. v. Hodel, 799 F.2d 1423 (10th Cir. 1986). “§§ 33-2-101 to -108 (1984); Ga.Code Ann. §§ 27-3-130 to -132 (1986); Ill.”
Annotations are extracted automatically from the opinions in the Syfert caselaw corpus and ranked by authority, recency, and treatment. Dots show Syfertize treatment of the citing case itself.