Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448
(Code 1981, §29-4-14, enacted by Ga. L. 2004, p. 161, § 1.)
- Probate court did not err by dismissing the hospital's petition for emergency guardianship for failure to satisfy the requirements of O.C.G.A. § 29-4-14(b)(4) because the hospital presented nothing to satisfy § 29-4-14's requirement of establishing an immediate and substantial risk of death or serious physical injury, illness, or disease unless an emergency guardian was appointed. In the Interest of Farr, 322 Ga. App. 55, 743 S.E.2d 615 (2013).
Cited in Maccabees Mut. Life Ins. Co. v. Morton, 941 F.2d 1181 (11th Cir. 1991); Luther v. Luther, 289 Ga. App. 428, 657 S.E.2d 574 (2008).
- In light of the similarity of the statutory provisions, opinions under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-9 are included in the annotations for this Code section.
- If the appointment of an emergency guardian under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-8 is only for that period of time pending the outcome either of the emergency guardianship hearing or the permanent guardianship hearing, the order would not be final or appealable to a jury in superior court, and hence would not be subject to Ga. L. 1986, p. 982, affecting procedures before the probate court in certain counties; on the other hand, if the petition before the probate court sought only an emergency guardian for a period not to exceed 45 days, as in a situation where immediate surgical or other medical consent was required for a seriously ill person proposed to be a ward, an order granting such a petition, which would leave nothing further to be decided by the probate court, would be final, appealable to a superior court jury, and hence would be a "civil case" under the 1986 Act, giving a party a right to demand a jury trial. 1986 Op. Att'y Gen. No. U86-18 (decided under former O.C.G.A. § 29-5-8).
No results found for Georgia Code 29-4-14.