Your Trusted Partner in Personal Injury & Workers' Compensation
Call Now: 904-383-7448(Code 1933, § 58-826, enacted by Ga. L. 1977, p. 1316, § 1; Code 1933, § 5A-5103, enacted by Ga. L. 1980, p. 1573, § 1.)
- What constitutes manufacturing and who is a manufacturer under tax laws, 17 A.L.R.3d 7.
Total Results: 13
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2022-04-19
Snippet: jury’s verdicts. See, e.g., Ortiz v. State, 291 Ga. 3, 6 (3) (727 SE2d 103) (2012) (in considering merger
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2019-05-20
Citation: 828 S.E.2d 366, 305 Ga. 799
Snippet: quality standard, Ga. Comp. R. & Regs., r. 391-3-6-.03 (2) (b) (ii) **800(the "antidegradation rule")
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2017-10-30
Citation: 302 Ga. 474, 807 S.E.2d 350
Snippet: SE2d 585) (2015) (quoting Ortiz v. State, 291 Ga. 3, 6 (3) (727 SE2d 103) (2012)). Therefore, the trial court
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-05-11
Snippet: qualify as dying declarations under former OCGA § 24-3-6,3 which provided: “Declarations by any person in
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2015-05-11
Citation: 297 Ga. 112, 772 S.E.2d 692, 2015 Ga. LEXIS 302
Snippet: dying declarations under former OCGA § 24-3-6, 3 which provided: “Declarations by any person
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2014-09-22
Citation: 295 Ga. 684, 763 S.E.2d 484, 2014 Ga. LEXIS 720
Snippet: as a dying declaration under former OCGA § 24-3-6, 3 the deceased must have been conscious of
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2007-01-22
Citation: 640 S.E.2d 268, 281 Ga. 531, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 178, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 45
Snippet: demand. See generally Dobbs, Law of Remedies, § 3.6(3) (West, 2nd ed.) Thus, Georgia law wisely holds
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2005-10-11
Citation: 620 S.E.2d 800, 279 Ga. 735, 33 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2394, 2005 Fulton County D. Rep. 3138, 2005 Ga. LEXIS 661
Snippet: denial of its motion. [2] OCGA § 15-1-10.1(b)(3)-(6). [3] See R.W. Page Corp., 249 Ga. at 576, n. 1,
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-11-23
Citation: 609 S.E.2d 324, 278 Ga. 740, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3757, 59 ERC (BNA) 1507, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 1045
Snippet: technology" under Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 391-3-6-.03(2)(b). But in doing so, the majority not only substitutes
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 2004-09-27
Citation: 603 S.E.2d 263, 278 Ga. 432, 2004 Fulton County D. Rep. 3150, 2004 Ga. LEXIS 804
Snippet: orally argued on July 12, 2004. [2] See OCGA § 24-3-6. [3] At trial, Roger Walton's choice not to testify
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1988-06-30
Citation: 369 S.E.2d 740, 258 Ga. 361, 1988 Ga. LEXIS 337
Snippet: qualifying the statement as admissible under OCGA § 24-3-6. 3. Enumerated error 3 contends that the admission
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1981-09-09
Citation: 281 S.E.2d 607, 248 Ga. 124, 1981 Ga. LEXIS 942
Snippet: and Regulations of the State of Georgia § 475-3-.06 (3); Hoerner v. State, 246 Ga. 374 (2) (271 SE2d
Court: Supreme Court of Georgia | Date Filed: 1973-09-06
Citation: 200 S.E.2d 144, 231 Ga. 41, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 586
Snippet: State *43Board of Pardons and Paroles, Par. 475-3-.06 (3). The board, of course, has broad and ample authority